RI Divorce Attorney
460 views | +0 today
 
Scooped by David Slepkow
onto RI Divorce Attorney
Scoop.it!

Rhode Island Personal Injury Attorney | RI Car & Auto Accident Lawyers | Free Consult 401-437-1100 02915

Hurt? Call 401-437-1100. FREE Consult with a Rhode Island Personal Injury Attorney, RI Car & Auto Accident Lawyers in 02915. Motorcycle Crash & Premises
David Slepkow's insight:

If you are in a Rhode island Bike accident, it is important to take the necessary steps to protect your health and finances while you get your life back in order. The following steps will help you determine what to do if you are involved in a Rhode Island  motorcycle collision.

Seek Medical Attention

Typically, the seriousness of injuries involving a motorcycle collision can be catastrophic. Because of that, it is essential to seek immediate medical attention.  You may feel numbness in your extremities, pain in your internal organs, or be unconscious due to head trauma. Awaiting professional medical assistance is your best chance of surviving the accident with minimal problems.

Document Injuries and Damage

If possible, it is important to ask witnesses to remain at the scene and provide their names and numbers to you, along with other motorists and law enforcement documenting the accident. If you cannot collect the information, ask others to gather the data for you. Losing an eyewitness to the case may be devastating at the time of a claim settlement or lawsuit trial.

Either take photographs of the accident scene, or ask others to use their mobile phone camera to take pictures for you. Take as many photographs as possible from a variety of different angles. Have others document your injuries in photographs at the scene and when receiving emergency care.

No comment yet.
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Scooped by David Slepkow
Scoop.it!

Rehabilitative Alimony law: Who qualifies? Factors Courts consider

Rehabilitative Alimony law: Who qualifies? Factors Courts consider | RI Divorce Attorney | Scoop.it
"Alimony is a rehabilitative tool intended to provide temporary support until a spouse is self-sufficient, and is based purely on need.
David Slepkow's insight:

RI divorce lawyer David Slepkow answers the following FAQS concerning RI Spousal Support: Who Qualifies for Alimony? What Factors must a Family Court Judge Look at to whether a litigant qualifies?

Rhode Island alimony law

Alimony is payments that one spouse may be ordered to pay another spouse for support as a result of a divorce.  Some spouses qualify for alimony. Spousal Support is also known as Alimony or Spousal Maintenance.

R.I.G.L 15-5-16 sets forth the factors that a Providence Family Court Judge should use in determining whether a Husband or Wife Qualifies for Spousal Support.

Rehabilitative alimony in RI

The RI Supreme Court Stated “Alimony is a rehabilitative tool intended to provide temporary support until a spouse is self-sufficient, and is based purely on need.” Berard v. Berard 

The Rhode Island Alimony statute is set forth below. “alimony should be ‘payable for a short, but specific and terminable period of time, which will cease when the recipient is, in the exercise of reasonable efforts, in a position of self-support.'” Thompson v. Thompson

The intent of alimony is rehabilitative in nature. “alimony should be ‘payable for a short, but specific and terminable period of time, which will cease when the recipient is, in the exercise of reasonable efforts, in a position of self-support.'” Id.

RI not well regarded for generous awards

Rhode Island is not well regarded as a state that is generous in awarding alimony. RI’s neighbor, Massachusetts is known as a state that is very generous in its alimony determinations despite recent laws in Mass. limiting permanent alimony. The primary reason for this is the “rehabilitative” nature of alimony in RI. RI is not an income equalization state!

Generally, Alimony is awarded for a period of time, in increments which are usually weekly or monthly. Alimony could be awarded as a result of a Divorce settlement. If a party requests alimony or is unwilling to waive alimony and the parties cannot agree to an alimony award, then alimony may be awarded at the divorce trial.

Temporary alimony in Providence Family Court

Temporary Alimony may be awarded by the Family Court towards the beginning of the divorce case. This temporary Alimony award will stay in effect until the final decision by the judge at the Trial. (unless it is modified based on a substantial change in circumstances) Alimony is usually awarded on a temporary basis but can be awarded on an indefinite and (perhaps what turns out to be permanent) basis if the facts justify indefinite alimony. The Rhode Island Supreme Court ruled that “Alimony may be awarded even for an indefinite period as long as the trial justice considers all the statutory factors.”

Permanent alimony allowed in Rhode Island?

Indefinite alimony may be ordered in a case where a party is seriously disabled or as a result of old age is unable to work. Indefinite alimony could also be awarded in a plethora of different factual circumstances.

The Court must look at “The health, age, station, occupation, amount and source of income, vocational skills and employ-ability of the party’s in making a spousal support award.”  Ability to pay is a crucial factor in determining the amount of alimony and whether alimony should be awarded. There are many cases in which a spouse is in desperate need of alimony, but the other spouse does not have the ability to pay alimony. In some cases, the spouse does not have an ability to pay because of a child support obligation to the other spouse or child support owed for other children.

Furthermore, according to The Rhode Island Supreme Court, “Section 15-5-16 does not explicitly prohibit one lump-sum award.” However, lump sum award alimony appears to be disfavored.

Who are the best candidates for an alimony award?

The best candidate for alimony is a spouse who put aside his or her career ambitions for many years to be a homemaker and care for the children. As a result of the role of nurturing the children and establishing and maintaining a home, the other spouse was able to advance his or her career in order to be able to afford to pay alimony.

In some cases, the family decided that one parent would put aside his or her career aspirations to raise a child or minor children. As a result, the homemaker’s skill set is so outmoded that he or she is unable to obtain suitable employment. This is usually because the homemaker’s job skills, employment history, licenses, training, skills, experience or degrees became outmoded or irrelevant. Perhaps the person does not have enough of an employment history to be able to be self-supporting and self-sufficient without receiving alimony. In some cases, the spouse is unable to work because the spouse currently has a physical custody and placement of a young child.

For this type of person, the intent of an award of Rehabilitative Alimony would be to allow a person to build a work history, advance his or her education, employment training, licenses etc. so that the person can be self-supporting and self-sufficient in the future.

The disabled

Another type of person who is an excellent candidate for alimony is a person who is temporarily disabled or permanently disabled especially if the marriage has been a long marriage. Another good candidate for alimony is a spouse who has severely disabled children which renders it difficult or impossible for the person to seek employment.

“The assignment of property must precede any determination of alimony because the needs of each party will be affected by the equitable distribution of the marital estate. Section 15-5-16.1(c). In determining the amount of alimony, the court must consider: “(i) [t]he length of the marriage; (ii) [t]he conduct of the parties during the marriage; (iii) [t]he health, age, station, occupation, amount and source of income, vocational skills, and employability of the parties; and (iv) [t]he state and the liabilities and needs of each of the parties.” Section15-5-16(b)(1).6

Child support and alimony

Rhode Island Child Custody and Placement plays a role in an alimony determination. If the parties have children, the Court must also make an award of Rhode Island Child Support before the Court determines an alimony award.  The Child Support award plays a large role in determining the resources of the parent with physical custody of the minor child. A child support order may severely affect an individuals ability to afford alimony in the future.

The needs and expenses of both parties is crucial in determining alimony

Needs and expenses are intertwined with the standard of living of the parties. The Court may look at the following types of expenses and needs: rent, mortgage, taxes, insurance, food, health insurance, uninsured medical expenses, prescription expenses, dental expenses, cable, internet, utilities, heat, gas, vehicle expenses etc.

Conduct such as affairs not really relevant

Although conduct is a factor in alimony determinations per the RI Alimony Statute, it is not a significant factor since alimony is primarily based on need. Conduct such as an affair, drug or alcohol addiction, gambling problem, domestic violence plays more of a role in equitable division of assets then in an Alimony determination.

Federal income tax implications

An award of alimony no longer has Federal Income Tax consequences. Alimony is not taxable to the spouse who receives the alimony and is not deductible by the spouse who pays alimony. Payment of alimony is NOT a taxable event  Payment of child support is, also, a non-taxable event. The parent who pays child support is not entitled to a deduction for payment and the receiving spouse does not include the payment as income. Therefore, it is tax free money to the parent who receives the child support. 26 U.S.C.A. 71.

The designation of payments as alimony rather than property distribution has consequences in Bankruptcy Proceedings. An alimony award is generally not dischargeable in Bankruptcy. The interrelation between family law, alimony and bankruptcy is also beyond the scope of this article. Please consult with a RI Bankruptcy Lawyer / Attorney.

Modify alimony?

Another important issue, perhaps crucial issue, is whether or not the parties entered into a property settlement agreement in the divorce.  In order for the alimony to be completely non-modifiable, the alimony must be agreed to in a Property settlement agreement. A Property settlement agreement is otherwise known as a Marital Settlement Agreement. (MSA) The Court has no power to modify a property settlement agreement. A Court can only enforce or interpret a property settlement agreement. In the event of impossibility of payment, the Court could award equitable relief, equitably reforming the contract between the parties.  Please contact a Rhode Island divorce attorney concerning whether or not it is advisable to draft a Property Settlement agreement in your case.

Proper drafting of a Property Settlement Agreement and Alimony provisions in a Property Settlement Agreement is beyond the scope of this article.

The length of the marriage is a very important factor that the RI Family Court Judge looks at in determining Alimony. The Court also needs to hear testimony concerning the party requesting alimony plan to become self-supporting and self-sufficient.

The Court can also look at the relative ability of both spouses to earn income and or acquire assets and property in the future

If a person is ordered to pay alimony and does not pay alimony, the other person can file a contempt motion. If a person is found in willful contempt of a Court order, he could be jailed until they purge themselves of the contempt. Rhode Island Family Court judges take failure to comply with their alimony orders very seriously. If the Alimony award is modifiable, either party could file a motion to modify the alimony based on a substantial change in circumstances.

  • 15-5-16 Alimony and counsel fees – Custody of children.

(a) In granting any petition for divorce, divorce from bed and board, or relief without the commencement of divorce proceedings, the family court may order either of the parties to pay alimony or counsel fees, or both, to the other.

(b) In determining the amount of alimony or counsel fees, if any, to be paid, the court, after hearing the witnesses, if any, of each party, shall consider:

(i) The length of the marriage;

(ii) The conduct of the parties during the marriage;

(iii) The health, age, station, occupation, amount and source of income, vocational skills, and employability of the parties; and

(iv) The state and the liabilities and needs of each of the parties.

(2) In addition, the court shall consider:

(i) The extent to which either party is unable to support herself or himself adequately because that party is the primary physical custodian of a child whose age, condition, or circumstances make it appropriate that the parent not seek employment outside the home, or seek only part-time or flexible-hour employment outside the home;

(ii) The extent to which either party is unable to support herself or himself adequately with consideration given to:

(A) The extent to which a party was absent from employment while fulfilling homemaking responsibilities, and the extent to which any education, skills, or experience of that party have become outmoded and his or her earning capacity diminished;

(B) The time and expense required for the supported spouse to acquire the appropriate education or training to develop marketable skills and find appropriate employment;

(C) The probability, given a party’s age and skills, of completing education or training and becoming self-supporting;

(D) The standard of living during the marriage;

(E) The opportunity of either party for future acquisition of capital assets and income;

(F) The ability to pay of the supporting spouse, taking into account the supporting spouse’s earning capacity, earned and unearned income, assets, debts, and standard of living;

(G) Any other factor which the court expressly finds to be just and proper.

(c) For the purposes of this section, “alimony” is construed as payments for the support or maintenance of either the husband or the wife.

(2) Alimony is designed to provide support for a spouse for a reasonable length of time to enable the recipient to become financially independent and self-sufficient. However, the court may award alimony for an indefinite period of time when it is appropriate in the discretion of the court based upon the factors set forth in subdivision (b)(2)(ii)(B). After a decree for alimony has been entered, the court may from time to time upon the petition of either party review and alter its decree relative to the amount and payment of the alimony, and may make any decree relative to it which it might have made in the original suit. The decree may be made retroactive in the court’s discretion to the date that the court finds that a substantial change in circumstances has occurred; provided, the court shall set forth in its decision the specific findings of fact which show a substantial change in circumstances and upon which findings of facts the court has decided to make the decree retroactive. Nothing provided in this section shall affect the power of the court as subsequently provided by law to alter, amend, or annul any order of alimony previously entered. Upon the remarriage of the spouse who is receiving alimony, the obligation to pay alimony shall automatically terminate at once.”

Can a woman be ordered to pay alimony in Rhode Island?

Yes. Absolutely. The same Rhode Island Alimony Laws apply to a woman’s potential obligation to pay alimony that apply for a man. However, under the old common Law it was only a husband who had a legal obligation to support his wife. Those were very different times because woman were not allowed to own any property. Also, there was no absolute divorce in those days.

The Rhode Island Supreme Court licenses all Lawyers / Attorneys in the general practice of law, but does not license or certify any lawyer as an expert or specialist in any field of practice

No comment yet.
Scooped by David Slepkow
Scoop.it!

Child Support Contempt in Rhode Island Family Court

Child Support Contempt in Rhode Island Family Court | RI Divorce Attorney | Scoop.it
CALL Rhode Island Child Support Lawyer. RI child support contempt attorney, David Slepkow 401-437-1100. Voted TOP 3 lawyer in RI by Projo Journal Reader's.
David Slepkow's insight:
Child Support Contempt in Rhode Island | RI Support lawyer

Child support contempt in RI

If a father or mother violates a Providence Family Court decree or order by not paying court ordered child support, then the custodial parent has the option of filing a RI child support contempt motion seeking a finding of contempt against the non-custodial parent.  The payee who has allegedly not met his or her support obligation has the legal right to a hearing on the merits. Providence Family Court rules set forth certain notice requirements. A Rhode Island child support attorney explains RI child support contempt. RI child support is a serious matter and the consequences for not paying child support can be severe.

Rhode Island Child Support Contempt

Does the State of Rhode Island Child Support Enforcement office ever initiate a contempt motion for failure to provide child support? If the person entitled to receive child support in Rhode Island and Providence Plantations is on cash assistance then payment may be owed to the State of Rhode Island. Child Support Enforcement may file a motion seeking a contempt finding. RI Child support enforcement also could file for contempt if the custodial mother or father is receiving full services from RI Child Support enforcement.

Right to a lawyer?

Does a litigant who is accused of being a deadbeat dad or deadbeat mom have a right to a RI Family Court lawyer representing him or her in the contempt motion in Providence Family Court?

  • In the event of a possibility of jail time and the accused deadbeat parent cannot afford a Providence child support attorney then the Family Court Magistrate, Justice or General Magistrate must insure that the person has a RI child support attorney providing legal representation.
  • The Magistrate has a list of Court Appointed lawyers who are paid peanuts by the State of RI.
  • Otherwise, the Court will appoint one of the lawyers from Rhode Island Legal Services to represent the person.

Can a RI child support contempt motion be settled prior to a hearing?

  • Yes. There is often an opportunity to settle the RI child support matter prior to any hearing in which a judge may find a person in willful contempt.

Can a contempt motion be filed in a divorce, miscellaneous petition, post-divorce or other Providence Family Court proceeding?

A Kent or Newport County child support contempt case could be part of a RI matrimonial dissolution / divorcechild custody war, Complaint for Separate Maintenance without filing for divorce,  Complaint for divorce from Bed and Board, dcyf petition, child visitation, paternity or other type of Family Court case.

What types of settlements can be reached?

A settlement in a Providence Family Court child support matter typically may include any one of the following or a combination of the following:

  • the contemptuous payor promising to stay current in support payments,
  • tendering a lump sum of cash,
  • a child support payment plan,
  • staying current in addition to an arrearage order, etc.

There are some payee parents who will not settle the matter prior to a hearing on the merits. These wronged parents are aggressive and often seeking that the deadbeat spend some time in the can.

Describe the concept of technical contempt in Rhode Island Family Court

Failure to properly follow and abide by a child support order in RI could amount to a finding of technical contempt for failure to pay support as ordered.  If the judge agrees that a contempt is not willful then the judge may stop short of making a finding of willful contempt. The Justice may let a guy off the hook with what amounts to a slap on the face, a finding of technical contempt.  The  Justice may find that a person had a valid explanation for failure to provide his children with Court order support. The justice may go easy on the person and make a finding of technical contempt. The following excuses may form the basis of a technical contempt finding:

  • losing employment (being fired, laid off),
  • loss of income,
  • disability,
  • injury at employment,
  • medical issues,
  • or a laundry list of other excuses or rationalizations 

A person found to be in technical contempt will not be sentenced to the Adult Correctional Institution (aci) (jail)! However, the person may be ordered to:

  • find employment,
  • raise a lump sum,
  • stay current and / or make payments on the arrears,
  • pay attorney fees,
  • make certain lump sum payments,
  • obtain a second job etc.

What factors influence a Providence Family Court judge’s decision as to whether contemptuous nonpayment of child support in the Ocean State is willful or just technical?

Many Magistrates, General Magistrates and Justices have little patience for people who do not support their children.  Nonetheless, the modern trend for justices is to steer clear of incarceration unless absolutely necessary and justified. If the parent under a support obligation has a justifiable explanation for his nonpayment it needs to be a good one or there could be a possibility of incarceration at the ACI. The amount of child support arrears owed by the noncustodial parent and the history for compliance with prior orders of the Family Court may play a large role in  the decision of the Washington County Family Court Judge! If a parent has a history of being a child support scofflaw, being a ne’er–do–well or history of failure to appear for hearings then this will not bode well for the obligor parent. A history of bench warrants for failure to appear certainly does not help. If these types of factors exist then there is a greater likelihood the judge will order time in the slammer. Of course, a prior history of technical or willful contempt will play a role in the decision.

Does the amount of child support arrears owed  make any difference in Kent county family Court?

The more a person owes the more likelihood that the person will be held in willful contempt.

What factors will a Rhode Island family Court judge look at? 

At a testimonial hearing on the merits, the Providence Family court Justice will examine pertinent and relevant documents that has been offered into evidence. The Justice on the domestic or reciprocal calendar will inquire whether the parent can raise a lump sum immediately or in the near future and whether they can obtain a loan from a friend, boyfriend, girlfriend or other family member.  The domestic court justice could look into in whether a child support obligor has assets that could be sold to pay such support obligation.

Do Child Support orders terminate automatically upon a child reaching the age of majority in Rhode Island and Providence Plantation or when circumstances change?

NO!!! If a non-custodial parent’s circumstances are altered then he or she must file a motion to modify child support when circumstances change. The child support payor cannot automatically stop paying child support when he loses his job, has another dependent child, becomes disabled or suffers a loss in income!

Child support in Rhode Island does not automatically modify when the persons circumstances change. If a modification of child support is granted by the Newport Family Court judge then any modification will be retroactive to the date of service of the new motion NOT THE DATE CIRCUMSTANCES CHANGED! This means that a person cannot take the law into their own hands and unilaterally change their own support obligation when their circumstances change. The child support order will run retroactive after the Providence Family Court issues a decree modifying the RI support. Therefore, if a person loses their job (is laid off or fired), has an additional dependent child, qualifies for ssi or ssdi (social security disability insurance) becomes disabled, has their hours are reduced / decreased or their pay decreases they must immediately file a motion to modify.

What is “willful contempt ” under Rhode Island Child Support Law?

If the judge makes a finding that a child support obligor is in willful contempt of the court’s orders, it means the justice believes that a person is thumbing their nose at the Court. This could be because the person’s excuse, explanation, rationalization or justification has no merit and is merely a bad faith attempt to evade the support obligation. The Magistrate may not believe the excuse for missing support payments is grounded in fact or is a valid excuse for nonpayment.

Willful contempt may also mean the following:

  1. failure to make ordered support payments despite the ability to do so
  2. A person has no job or employment but has not made reasonable attempts to secure such employment
  3. the person is able to work yet either isn’t working, is underemployed or not making proper efforts to find employment.
  4. The judge may believe that the contempt is willful because the person is lying, exaggerating his excuse or that the person is not acting in good faith.

What happens if the judge finds someone in willful contempt of a child support obligation in Rhode Island?

If a parent or citizen under a support obligation is determined to be in willful contempt by a Justice of The Rhode Island Family Court for not paying RI child support, the nonpaying parent could be sentenced to the aci (jail) from day to day. Contempt proceedings in Rhode Island and Providence Plantations are not criminal causes of action!  These proceedings can be quasi criminal in nature since incarceration is a possibility.  Contempt proceedings are not technically criminal causes of cation because they are intended to compel compliance with Rhode Island child support orders rather than punish for not tendering required support payments!

If an obligor parent is sentenced to the ACI for non-payment of child support, how does the person get out of jail?

The Providence Family Court Justice will usually state that upon payment of a lump sum the person will get out of jail. In child support motions there is always a way to get out of jail by making payment.  A person could be held in willful contempt and not be sentenced to the aci.

Does the state pay child support if the father is in jail?

No. The State of Rhode Island does not pay your child support if the father or mother is in jail.

Legal Notice per Rules of Professional Responsibility:

The Rhode Island Supreme Court licenses all lawyers in the general practice of law, but does not license or certify any lawyer as an expert or specialist in any field of practice.

No comment yet.
Scooped by David Slepkow
Scoop.it!

The Rules of War for Divorce

The Rules of War for Divorce | RI Divorce Attorney | Scoop.it
Your agenda in Providence Family Court is scorched earth philosophy which begins and ends with destroying & annihilating your spouse or ex. RI divorce war.
David Slepkow's insight:

 

If “you people” cannot avoid an unseemly and nasty divorce war, that no one can win, then you must abide by the written and unwritten rules of divorce war. Rhode Island divorce lawyers know who “you people” are!  “You people” are people who use and abuse the Rhode Island Family Court system. See also: Part 1 of 2- What qualifies as a divorce war? Coming soon Part 3 : “A peace treaty: How to end an out of Control Divorce or Child Custody War”

divorce law in RI

Written and unwritten rules of divorce war

I do not think a contentious divorce, visitation or child custody case in which the parties engage in discovery, disagreements, negotiations and numerous Providence Family Court hearings constitutes a divorce war!  A divorce war is something more, something much more.

After reading these 10 rules, there can be only one conclusion: AVOID A DIVORCE WAR AT ALL COSTS!

You abuse the judges, the police, daycare workers, dcyf, clerks and your Rhode Island family law lawyers for your irrational ‘agenda’. This “agenda” is not to prevail in your divorce cause of action. Your agenda is a scorched earth philosophy which begins and ends with destroying, ruining and annihilating your spouse or ex-spouse. Everyone wants you to GET LOSTIf you must engage in one, here are the rules:

The 10 rules of divorce war

  1. AVOID COLLATERAL DAMAGE- Don’t get ‘innocent’ civilians, who don’t care about your never-ending feud, embroiled in your meaningless and mean-spirited combat missions. Most of these people are trying to end the war or ignore it. The daycare provider does not want to see you throw a hussy fit or lob Molotov cocktails at each other in the “Kiddy Care” parking lot about who has visitation on that day. Keep “Innocents” such as teachers,  neighbors, spectators at soccer, football, or baseball games,  pediatricians, principals, court employees, fast food employees out of your nasty, dirty war.
  2.  KEEP THE CHILDREN OUT OF IT- Children are not pawns in your ongoing divorce war!  Children should not be leveraged to get a better financial settlement. Just let them have a childhood. Children are not couriers for your RI child support payments.  A child is not your messenger or negotiator for your visitation rights. DO not make negative or disparaging remarks about the other party in front of the child. This commentary is very damaging to children. Children who become immersed in RI Custody feuds or contentious divorces in Providence Family Court are more likely to have behavioral problems in school, be engaged in juvenile delinquency, become suicidal or abuse drugs and alcohol. *Parental Alienation is one of the worst things that a parent can do to a child.
  3.  NO HAND TO HAND COMBAT- Hand to hand combat could be hitting, pushing, chasing, screaming or car chases. This combat typically happens at the ‘scene of the battles’, typically the pickup and drop off of the minor child. These warring individuals, typically, recruit reinforcements or enablers to support their cause.  These enablers could be boyfriends, girlfriends or wacko mother in law.  These enablers often participate in this weekly or bi-weekly ‘events’. The parties do not care that the children witness these feuds. They have long stopped caring about how this is affecting their children. After all, this is A KNIFE FIGHT. Come one and come all!**
  4. DO NOT RESORT TO THE NUCLEAR OPTION The nuclear option will insure mutually assured destruction for both of you. There are many “going nuclear” tactics utilized in  Providence Family Court that I have witnessed. These outrageous tactics include telling a child that her stepmother who raised her was dead even though she was alive. Other tactics include, alleging false sexual molestation of a child or contacting immigration to have someone deported. I have seen people “lose” the family pictures or shave the child’s head. Some people make false allegations that the other parent hit or abused the other child. Others leave the State or Rhode Island and Providence Plantations with the child to deprive the other parent of a relationship with the child.
  5. AVOID PROPAGANDA- Fight your custody, visitation or divorce war in court and not on Facebook, Twitter or Google Plus. The crap that you post online could be viewed by your child or reported to your child. You cannot win the case by winning the hearts and minds of your posse and Facebook enablers. Your Facebook Friends (err enablers) will never tell you the truth or confront you in the error of your ways.
  6. DO NOT DISREGARD CODIFIED TREATIES- Follow the orders and laws of the State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations! If you insist on acting like a moron at least follow the court orders while you act like an idiot.
  7. HAVE A RATIONAL JUSTIFICATION FOR THE WAR AND A PLAN TO END IT. You will either run out of money to pay your RI Divorce lawyer, will fire one or more lawyers, or your child custody attorneys will run for the hills. In all likelihood, one or both of you will be representing yourself by the time this ends. Throughout the war, both will insist to the judge you want a trial on the merits. Neither of you have any clue on how to proceed at trial with an attorney. You have to figure out how the war will end. Most wars never end, they just temporarily cease military operations. Most of these Providence Family Court custody, visitation or divorce cases involving “wars” end unceremoniously with the parties running out of funds. In some cases both both parties are so beaten down that they lay down their arms temporarily without anyone winning the case.
  8. DO NOT ENGAGE IN A BATTLE OR A WAR UNLESS YOU ARE READY TO DEFEND A COUNTER ATTACK. There can be no limited tactical strikes without defending a massive ground war. Many people assume they can strike their spouse and their spouse will take it lying down. It is likely that your spouse will counter-punch setting off a series of never-ending skirmishes. Thus, the never-ending war. If you think that you can call his boss to get him fired or contact his paramours’ spouse to ruin their relationship or report him to the IRS without implications, then you are wrong. Your spouse will seek revenge and it won’t be pretty for you. If you cannot emotionally handle this revenge or the resulting war, then don’t attack first! There is an old adage-People in glass houses should not throw stones. When it comes to Rhode Island Family Court, I go one step farther and state “If you play near the fire you may get pushed in!” http://rhodeislanddivorcelawyerarticles.com/ri-family-court-if-you-play-near-the-fire-you-may-get-pushed-in/
  9.  DO NOT SEEK A TOTAL VICTORY-  There are no winners in this war. You will also suffer major injuries as a result of this.
  10.  PUT YOUR CHILD IN COUNSELING BEFORE THE WAR STARTS AND BE PREPARED TO RAISE A POTENTIALLY MENTALLY ILL CHILD Children who directly or indirectly witness these feuds are more likely to have mental health problems or have drug and violence issues when they become a teenager or adult.

*Parental Alienation is when one parent, typically the parent with physical custody, engages in a course of conduct which unjustifiably alienates or attempts to alienate a child against the other parent. Parental alienation is extremely harmful to children. Parental Alienation is not a syndrome.”

**“Dad reaches in to start to get the child. Mother starts to drive away and almost runs over the father’s foot. The child is crying and yelling “dadda dadda” The child’s toy falls into the parking lot.”

Statistics:

“As shown in Table 8, most separated women and men made the transition to divorce from first marriage within 5 years. Among women, about one-half were divorced from a first marriage within 1 year of separation, 79% within 3 years, and 86% of women within 5 years. Among men, 65% were divorced within 1 year, 81% within 3 years, and 87% within 5 years. There were significant differences in the probability of transitioning from separation to divorce from first marriage within 1 year by selected demographic characteristics. Within 1 year, the probability of making the transition from separation to divorce was 59% for white women, compared with 44% for U.S.-born Hispanic women, 40% for foreign-born Hispanic women, and 30% for black women. Sixty-nine percent of white men had made the transition from separation to divorce within 1 year, compared with 51% of foreign-born Hispanic men, 44% of U.S.-born Hispanic men, and 36% of black men. Women (58%) and men (66%) with more than a high school diploma were more likely to make the transition to divorce within 1 year compared with 37% of women and 54% of men without a high school diploma. ”  National Health Statistics Report, First Marriages in the United States: Data From the 2006–2010 National Survey of Family Growth by Casey E. Copen, Ph.D.; Kimberly Daniels, Ph.D.; Jonathan Vespa, Ph.D.; and William D. Mosher, Ph.D., Division of Vital Statistics, Number 49 n March 22, 2012   http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr049.pdf#x2013;2010 National Survey of Family Growth [PDF – 419 KB</a>

No comment yet.
Scooped by David Slepkow
Scoop.it!

When can a child decide which parent to live with?

When can a child decide which parent to live with? | RI Divorce Attorney | Scoop.it
CALL Rhode Island Child Custody Lawyer, David Slepkow. 401-437-1100. RI Family Court Attorney. Providence divorce attorneys. Child Support in Providence.
David Slepkow's insight:
When can a child decide which parent to live with?
august 29, 2015 by david (edit)

Is there a particular age when a child in Rhode Island can decide which parent they want to reside with, in a RI child custody, post divorce or divorce cause of action? A Rhode Island child custody attorney discusses the important issue of when a child’s preference is important in a child custody case in RI.

  • Can Children Choose Which Parent They Want to Live?
  • When Can a Child Choose Which Parent to Live with in Rhode Island?

Can a child in Rhode Island decide where they want to live?

There is no set age under Rhode Island family laws when a minor child can decide to live with their mother or father in a Rhode Island child custody case. In fact, theoretically, the child is not allowed to make that decision. Older children have a very significant impact on child custody determinations by a Providence RI Family Court Judge or General Magistrate. An older child’s wishes are often respected and followed by a RI Family Court justice. In making a child custody determination, the Providence Court Judge or Magistrate decides the case based on the “best interest of the child.”

Preference of child only one factor in physical placement determination

Rhode Island child custody attorney

The preference of the child is only one of the factors that a Providence Family Court Judge may consider in determining the best interest of the child. The Factors a Family Court Judge should use in making a “best interest of the child” determination are set forth in the seminal Rhode Island case of Pettinato v Pettinato, 589 A.2d 909 (R.I. 1990) Please see below for all factors that the Rhode Island Family Court utilizes to determine Child Custody. see Child Custody Law in RI

(If you are in need of a child custody attorney in Rhode Island, contact East Providence child custody lawyer, David Slepkow.)

Older children have greater input into where they will live

If an older child such as a 15, 16 or 17 year-old has a preference and that opinion is expressed to the Judge, Court Investigator or Guardian ad Litem than the judge will usually respect the child’s desire. Of course, there may be countervailing factors which may convince the judge not to respect an older child’s parental preference.

These countervailing factors may include:

  • Drug and alcohol abuse by the minor child
  • Mental health problems of the child
  • Lack of a good relationship with the parent the child wants to live with
  • Poor judgment or decision making of the child
  • The stability of the child’s home environment and potential instability of the other parent
  • Lack of maturity or judgment of the child
  • How the child is adjusted to his or her home, school or community.

Exceptions to older children’s influence

There are some exceptions in Newport Family Court or RI family Court to an older child’s decision being the decisive factor. In some cases, despite the child’s

RI divorce lawyers Slepkow

advanced age, the child does not know what is in his or her best interest. In some cases the child abuses drugs and alcohol, does poorly in school, misbehaves, has a criminal record or has mental health issues.

Also if the child does not have a good reason for his decision then the judge can deny the child’s request. If the other parent is not a fit and proper person to have placement of the child, then the Judge can deny the request. The judge can deny a child’s request if the parent the child would like to reside with has a drug or alcohol problem, severe mental health condition or a serious criminal record. In some cases, RI Family Court Judges are hesitant to change placement if the child is very immature for her age and has behavioral issues and the child is merely rebelling against the imposition of rules and structure.

Do children have influence over visitation terms in Rhode Island

Children also may be given influence in Child Visitation cases in RI. Children may play a role in the determination of whether visitation should be overnight and the schedule and frequency of the visits. Children may play a role in whether visitation should be supervised or unsupervised and the length of duration of visitation. Children also may be given influence when the parent with physical custody files a motion to relocate out of state.

Practical Tip: If you are aware that your children support your position regarding Visitation, Custody, Placement or Relocation out of state then have your children interviewed by the Judge, RI Family Services or a Guardian ad Litem.

Can younger children decide where they want to live?

Children ages 11, 12, 13 & 14 may also be given significant influence over Rhode Island Child Custody, Visitation and Relocation cases.

Do all judges deal with children in the same manner?

Judges in Rhode Island Family Court have different philosophies on how they deal with children. Some judges will not interview children. They will have the Guardian ad litem interview the children. The Guardian ad Litem then will issue a report to the RI Family Court Judge or Magistrate handling the matter. (In Rhode Island (RI), A guardian ad litem is a individual who represents the hypothetical best interest of the minor child in a child custody, visitation or other type of Family Court case. Guardians are frequently used in in contentious custody cases when the parties can afford the additional expense. The judge could make an appointment or the parties can agree to a guardian being appointed. A guardian does not make the final decision as to which parent shall get physical placement or legal custody of the child. The judge makes the final decision regarding custody, visitation and physical placement / possession after hearing testimony at trial or hearing. The guardian drafts a report to submit to the Court with his or her findings and recommendations. see The Role of the Guardian Ad Litem in Family Court in Rhode Island http://www.hg.org/article.asp?id=18219 )

There are some family law judges who will bring the child into chambers for an interview. The Judge will usually bring the court reporter to transcribe the proceedings. Some judges will allow the RI divorce attorneys or Rhode Island child custody lawyers to question the child in chambers in front of the judge.

Practical Tip: Don’t coach your children. This is unfair to the child and puts unnecessary stress and pressure on the child. Also, the Child will usually tell the Judge or Family services about the coaching. If the Judge believes that you have engaged in coaching, then there may be severe sanctions. The Sanctions may include the judge denying your request for placement, sole custody or relocation.

A child’s preference is not decisive, it may be given weight

The older a child is, the more weight / influence the judge will give to the child’s preferences regarding custody, placement, visitation and relocation out of state. Younger children usually have a greater influence on proving facts rather than making decisions. The child may tell the investigator or Judge that their parent abuses them or if they are afraid of their parent. The child may tell the investigator that the parent makes negative or disparaging comments about a parent in front of the child. The child may make allegations regarding parental alienation.

Children typically do not get to make the decision concerning legal custody. Legal custody pertains to who gets to make decisions concerning religion, education, social development, activities and medical decisions. Legal Custody will either be Sole Custody to one parent or Joint Custody to both parents.

Child Custody matters involving preference of the child may play a role in Rhode Island Divorce, Paternity, Miscellaneous Petitions for Custody, DCYF, Motions to modify Custody or placement and visitation disputes. Children have no real influence on Child Support cases.

RI Child Custody Factors:

“1. The wishes of the child’s parent or parents regarding the child’s custody.
2. The reasonable preference of the child, if the court deems the child to be of sufficient intelligence, understanding, and experience to express a preference.
3. The interaction and interrelationship of the child with the child’s parent or parents, the child’s siblings, and any other person who may significantly affect the child’s best interest.
4. The child’s adjustment to the child’s home, school, and community.
5. The mental and physical health of all individuals involved.
6. The stability of the child’s home environment.
7. The moral fitness of the child’s parents.
8. The willingness and ability of each parent to facilitate a close and continuous parent-child relationship between the child and the other parent.” Pettinato v. Pettinato, 582 A.2d 909, 913-14 (R.I. 1990).”

Searches related to child custody rhode island

Resources and Statistics

“About half (50.6 percent) of all custodial parents had either legal or informal child support agreements. • Custodial parents receiving the full amount of child support due declined between 2007 and 2009, from 46.8 percent to 41.2 percent. • Of the $35.1 billion in child support due in 2009, 61.0 percent was reported as received, averaging $3,630 per custodial parent who was due support. • Child support represented 62.6 percent of the average income for custodial parents below poverty who received full support.” Custodial Mothers and Fathers and Their Child Support: 2009 Consumer Income,  Issued December 2011 P60-240 Current Population Reports By Timothy S. Grall http://www.census.gov/prod/2011pubs/p60-240.pdf 

Rhode Island divorce attorney, David Slepkow represents clients in the following types of RI family law matters: child support, visitation, paternity and child custody.

Rhode Island Attorneys legal Notice per RI Rules of Professional Responsibility:

The Rhode Island Supreme Court licenses all lawyers / attorneys in the general practice of law, but does not license or certify any lawyer or attorney as an expert or specialist in any field of practice.

filed under: ri child custody
No comment yet.
Scooped by David Slepkow
Scoop.it!

RI divorce attorney explains Rhode Island Divorce laws

RI divorce attorney explains Rhode Island Divorce laws | RI Divorce Attorney | Scoop.it
Rhode Island divorce attorney, David Slepkow answers several basic yet important questions concerning Rhode Island divorce law and procedure.
David Slepkow's insight:

Rhode Island divorce attorney, David Slepkow answers several basic yet important questions concerning Rhode Island divorce law and procedure. These divorce questions and answers will help divorce litigants and those thinking about filing for divorce in Rhode Island navigate through the complex, and confusing minefield that is RI Family Court.

What are the grounds to obtain a divorce in Rhode Island?

The grounds to obtain a divorce in Rhode Island are:

  • “irreconcilable differences which have caused the irremediable breakdown of the marriage (SECTION 15-5-3.1),
  • the parties have lived separate and apart from each other for the space of at least three years (SECTION 15-5-3),
  • Impotency;
  •  Adultery;
  • Extreme cruelty;
  • Willful desertion for five years of either of the parties,
  • or for willful desertion for a shorter period of time in the discretion of the court;
  • Continued drunkenness;
  •  The habitual, excessive, and intemperate use of opium, morphine, or chloral;
  • Neglect and refusal, for the period of at least one year next before the filing of the petition, on the part of the husband to provide necessaries for the subsistence of his wife, the husband being of sufficient ability;
  • and any other gross misbehavior and wickedness, in either of the parties, repugnant to and in violation of the marriage covenant.”  § 15-5-2 Additional grounds for divorce.  TITLE 15 Domestic Relations CHAPTER 15-5 Divorce and Separation

Is Rhode Island a no-fault state?

Yes. Rhode Island is a “no fault” divorce state. However, a no-fault designation is a misnomer since “no fault” means that fault grounds are not necessary in order to obtain a divorce in Rhode Island. This does NOT mean that fault is irrelevant in a Rhode Island divorce.  This means that all that is required TO OBTAIN A DIVORCE is irreconcilable differences that lead to the irremediable breakdown of the marriage (15-5-3.1).

The vast majority of divorces in Rhode Island are filed based on irreconcilable differences grounds. Of the divorces that are filed based on fault grounds, the vast majority are not granted based on fault grounds. This results from the all too common reality that the alleged at fault spouse refuses to settle the divorce case with a fault designation. Some divorces in which fault grounds are the alleged basis for the divorce are granted based on fault grounds when there is a full divorce trial on the merits and the judge issues findings of fact. Some RI divorces are granted based on fault grounds when the other spouse was defaulted for not attending court or answering the RI divorce case. Here is an article authored by Rhode Island divorce lawyer, David Slepkow concerning no fault divorce in Rhode Island. Why Fault Matters in a NO Fault Divorce in Rhode Island

divorce laws in RI

Fault still could play a role in the equitable distribution of assets and debts pursuant to the Rhode Island equitable distribution statute (SECTION 15-5-16.1) The equitable distribution statute sets forth 12 factors to determine equitable distribution. Factors #2  and #11 directly pertain to fault as a grounds to distribute debt and assets. Element #12 is a catch-all which could include fault. Here are elements #2, #11 and #12 from the RI equitable distribution statute: “… (2) “The conduct of the parties during the marriage; …. (11) Either party’s wasteful dissipation of assets or any transfer or encumbrance of assets made in contemplation of divorce without fair consideration; and…. (12) Any factor which the court shall expressly find to be just and proper.”  RI General law 15-5-3.1 I would also point out that other factors could be relevant to fault such as the contributions each spouse has made to preservation of assets.

How long does an uncontested divorce take in Rhode Island?

Editor’s note: 2108  divorce in ri update – There is no longer a 60 day waiting period to get a divorce in Rhode Island. Rhode Island general law 15-5-14 has been amended. However, nominal court dates are still scheduled approximately 60 days after filing. If everything is agreed to by the parties and the matter is uncontested, the initial court date is usually 60 plus days from the date the divorce is filed.  The initial court date approximately 60 days from filing is called the “nominal hearing. After the Rhode Island Family Court issues a decision at the nominal trial, there is a three month waiting period until final judgment of divorce may enter. Therefore, the usual time** to get a divorce in Rhode Island is approximately 151 days (5 months).

A contested divorce could take a year or longer to complete in Rhode Island.

Is there a waiting period in Rhode Island to finalize a divorce?

Rhode Island child support law

Yes. After a decision by the justice of the family court at a nominal divorce hearing or contested  divorce trial, the final judgment may not be submitted to the court for entry until after 3 months. This was implemented by the legislature allowing a cooling off period in case the parties reconciled and decided not to go through with the divorce.

“§ 15-5-23 Final judgment – Remarriage.  (a) No judgment for a divorce shall become final and operative until three (3) months after the trial and decision. Final decree from the bond of marriage may be entered ex parte and in chambers on the suggestion of the prevailing party at any time within one hundred eighty (180) days next after the expiration of three (3) months from the date of decision. After the expiration of the one hundred eighty (180) days, final decrees may be entered only in open court and on motion or upon written consent of the attorneys or parties. Notice of the filing of the motion shall not be required in cases in which the original complaint is unanswered.” http://webserver.rilin.state.ri.us/Statutes/title15/15-5/15-5-23.HTM

When can I get remarried after a divorce in ri?

“After entry of the final judgment for a divorce from the bond of marriage, either party may marry again.” http://webserver.rilin.state.ri.us/Statutes/title15/15-5/15-5-23.HTM 

Do I need a Rhode Island divorce attorney to file for divorce in Rhode Island?

No, a divorce lawyer in RI is not required in Rhode Island Family court. However, it is usually a bad idea to represent yourself in a divorce, especially if the divorce is contested. Divorce lawyers in Rhode Island will be familiar with the Court system, divorce law in RI and the the judges who will decide the case as well as the rules and procedures of the Court

No comment yet.
Scooped by David Slepkow
Scoop.it!

Husband seeks to represent his wife in divorce citing obscure RI Statute

Husband seeks to represent his wife in divorce citing obscure RI Statute | RI Divorce Attorney | Scoop.it
This guy had at ton of chutzpah when he not only attempted to represent his wife in their divorce, he attempted to fire his wife's RI divorce attorney!
No comment yet.
Scooped by David Slepkow
Scoop.it!

Weird Rhode Island Laws: objection to marriage to stop a wedding?

Weird Rhode Island Laws: objection to marriage to stop a wedding? | RI Divorce Attorney | Scoop.it
Surprisingly, pursuant to Rhode Island matrimonial law, someone can ruin a wedding by lodging an objection. SAY it ai'nt so!
No comment yet.
Scooped by David Slepkow
Scoop.it!

About RI Attorney David Slepkow- David Slepkow's ratings and reviews

About RI Attorney David Slepkow- David Slepkow's ratings and reviews | RI Divorce Attorney | Scoop.it
David Slepkow reviews and ratings- Family Law and Divorce Attorney Slepkow enjoys consistently high ratings within the field of family Law, divorce and child custody related matters. He always puts his clients first. David was voted a top 3 best lawyer in RI by the Providence Journal Reader's choice poll in 2018.
David Slepkow's insight:
About RI Attorney David Slepkow- David Slepkow’s ratings and reviews

Family Court Attorney David Slepkow Reviews and Ratings.

These are actual ratings and reviews of Rhode island divorce attorney, David Slepkow. These reviews and ratings of RI child custody attorney, Dvaid Slepkow, were posted across the internet over the last several years. David has a superb rating from AVVO- 10 out of 10. David was voted a top 3 attorney in Rhode Island by the Providence Journal Reader’s choice poll. David has over 20 years experience representing clients in Rhode Island Family Court.

  •  8/8/18- “David is an amazing attorney that knows the law. We came to him originally to consult with him in 2011 from out of state to talk to him about custody of my husband’s son who lived in RI. Dealing with an out-of-state custody situation can be costly and complicated. He was upfront and honest and let us know his best opinion and at that time it was to wait until he was “of age” to decide. Fast forward 6 years… The situation with my step-son had a lot of different variables, a lot of different things that a typical custody case. We were not going up against the mother; unfortunately she had passed away and the great-aunt had guardianship. David was strategic and skillful throughout the whole process. With a situation such as ours, it could have been long and drawn out. Everything moved quickly and from start to finish. ( approx 8 months) We now have custody and my step-son now lives with us out of state. Thank you David!”
  • “7/24/18- David is an amazing lawyer. He is honestly brilliant. Ive had many conversations with him regarding my high conflict custody battle and I’m always incredibly impressed by how he assesses each situation. I respect him very much for always being honest with me, even if what he’s saying is not what I was hoping to hear. He’s very knowledgeable and has helped me to protect my child for years now. He has never let us down and I truly believe that he cares about my case and the outcome. He’s committed and experienced and I would recommend him to anyone looking for a great lawyer. I had several consultations with several lawyers before choosing David, and I’ve never regretted choosing him once.”

Review this lawyer

  • Best Lawyer in Rhode Island!

    5.0 stars

    Posted by Sarah 
    December 13, 2016

     I have been through several lawyers in my custody battle. None of them handled the case like David. David spent countless hours fighting for not 1 but 2 of my children. He was very invested in our case and he really cared about the outcome of our case and my children. He was able to accurately depict what was going on with my childrens father…

    More 

    “He was excellent!”

    • Courtney H.

       I went to David with a work related DCYF matter. He was excellent! He had my best interest from day one! Issue is resolved! He saved my career!
      Apr 20, 2016
       

    “David Slepkow is the best!”

    • Paula H.

       I never take the time to write reviews because I am not easy to please I admit. David Slepkow is the best! I feel connected to him because he held my hand through my entire divorce which wasn’t pretty. I interviewed 2 attorneys before him and felt like a number. Thank you David for not only winning my case but for allowing me to cry on your shoulder. I hope that women mainly see this review because any woman I know for a fact will be grateful for you ! Also your prices we’re the most reasonable.
     
     

    “Brilliant Court Presence”

    5.0 stars

    Posted by anonymous 
    August 5, 2016

     David Slepkow has a BRILLIANT COURT PRESENCE. He is articulate and concise. His knowledge of the law is unsurpassed. I have nothing but but complete success on every legal issue in which he has represented me. I would go as far as to call him an advocate for women. I highly recommend David Slepkow. … More 
     

    “Outstanding Advocate”

    5.0 stars

    Posted by Michelle H. 
    August 24, 2015

     

    I was referred to David through a friend and client of his while looking to change counsel in the midst of a complicated motion in the Family Court. After meeting with David to review my case, it was evident that his knowledgable and understanding of the complicated Family Court System, that at times can leave families feeling quite vulernable, was…

    More 

    “Excellent Attorney, Amazing Person!”

    5.0 stars

    Posted by Nicole 
    July 16, 2015

     

    I am not typically the type of person who writes reviews, however, I feel that in this case it is necessary. David was my attorney in a very contentious divorce that took place over a 2 year period. He bent over backwards for me and my 3 children. He was my saving grace! He went above and beyond the call of duty! David is extremely knowledgeable, caring and compassionate. David’s level of communication was great and his attention to detail was above par! I would highly recommend David!

 

Courtney H. Apr 20, 2016

 
I went to David with a work related DCYF matter. He was excellent! He had my best interest from day one! Issue is resolved! He saved my career!

Best Rhode Island Family Attorney

Posted by Vernon, a Family client, 11 days ago.  Flag

Overall rating
 Excellent
Trustworthy
Excellent
Responsive
Excellent
Knowledgeable
Excellent
Kept me informed
Excellent
  • I recommend David Slepkow.
  • I used David 1-6 months ago.
  • David handled my Family matter.
  • I have previously worked with 1-2 lawyers.

We have had a 5 year relationship with David Slepkow as our family lawyer. He helped us with a divorce and a custody battle. The mediation he did during the divorce made a amiable agreement possible. The custody issue was more involved and we felt confident the whole time that we would end up with the result we were hoping for. Most of the time the Father gets the short end of the stick. But with David we won full custody and placement. Something that rarely happens. We were also very impressed with the respect he receives from peers at the court and how well all the other attorneys and judges know him. When we go to court with him, we feel he is at ease and at home in the Rhode Island family court. He is very efficient and always returns calls and never seemed to rush through things that were important to us. When we get the bill, it seems reasonable and very accurate. We would highly recommend anyone in Rhode Island to use David Slepkow as an attorney.


  1. Excellent Attorney, Good Person

    Posted by Susan, a Divorce client, 5 months ago.  Flag

    Overall rating
    Excellent
    Trustworthy
    Excellent
    Responsive
    Excellent
    Knowledgeable
    Excellent
    Kept me informed
    Excellent
    • I recommend David Slepkow.
    • I used David 1-6 months ago.
    • David handled my Divorce / Separation matter.
    • I have previously worked with 3-5 lawyers.

    I can easily recommend David. He is smart, diligent and compassionate. David listened and always acted in my best interest. He kept me informed of the legal process and explained the risks and rewards of my decisions. Whenever I needed to reach him he was always timely in getting back to me and he used every tool to do so. I also greatly appreciated the fact that David did not hesitate to seek other outside opinion when necessary. We reached a settlement that he negotiated well on my behalf. I would contact David should I ever need a lawyer again in any of his specialty areas.


  2. Great experience

    Posted by Peggy, a Debt Settlement client, over 1 year ago.  Flag

    Overall rating
    Excellent
    Trustworthy
    Excellent
    Responsive
    Excellent
    Knowledgeable
    Excellent
    Kept me informed
    Excellent
    • I recommend David Slepkow.
    • I used David 1-3 years ago.
    • David handled my Debt Settlement matter.
    • I have previously worked with 3-5 lawyers.

    I recently hired David to work on my Case,The communication throughout the ordeal was great, David worked very hard to get my case settled and I could not have been happier with the outcome !


  3. Highly Recommended

    Posted by Glen, a Divorce client, over 1 year ago.  Flag

    Overall rating
    Excellent
    Trustworthy
    Excellent
    Responsive
    Excellent
    Knowledgeable
    Excellent
    Kept me informed
    Excellent
    • I recommend David Slepkow.
    • I used David more than 3 years ago.
    • David handled my Divorce / Separation matter.
    • I have previously worked with 1-2 lawyers.

    I kept my house and pension and most importantly was given primary placement of my daughter. My divorce got pretty ugly at times but David was always there to talk me through the proper steps and keep the case moving forward.


  4. A good attorney

    Posted by a Criminal Defense client, over 2 years ago.  Flag

    Overall rating
    Excellent
    Trustworthy
    Excellent
    Responsive
    Excellent
    Knowledgeable
    Excellent
    Kept me informed
    Excellent
    • I recommend David Slepkow.
    • I used David 1-3 years ago.
    • David handled my Criminal Defense matter.

    David recently represented me in an uphill struggle to vacate a plea, then fight it. He was able to vacate the plea (which itself was an enormous accomplishment ) and then have the case dismissed. David is very knowledgeable, and clearly has done significant research in his field. What was also especially impressive to me was his excellent client service. He never went more than 24 hours to respond to messages, works on weekends, uses emails, and he clearly communicates procedures and potential scenarios. He was always on time, and sincerely wanted to provide tough defense. Hiring David is money well spent, and I wouldn’t think twice about it.


  5. Very Diligent Family Lawyer

    Posted by Julie, a Family client, over 2 years ago.  Flag

    Overall rating
    Excellent
    Trustworthy
    Excellent
    Responsive
    Excellent
    Knowledgeable
    Excellent
    Kept me informed
    Excellent
    • I recommend David Slepkow.
    • I used David 1-3 years ago.
    • David handled my Family matter.
    • I have previously worked with more than 10 lawyers.

    David went above and beyond for my case. I had a difficult legal issue involving my children that spanned two jurisdictions with little case law. I had been frustrated for many years with travel out of state when my children lived here in Rhode Island with me. David spent a lot of time with me discussing the case, making sure I understood the legal issues and what we needed to do to get a result that benefited my children. He did an excellent job of responding to complex legal issues in open court. He was extremely responsive to me and always returned calls and emails very promptly. I also felt as though he cared about doing what was best for my children. I highly recommend him.


  6. Great Attorney!

    Posted by Josh, a Divorce client, over 2 years ago.  Flag

    Overall rating
    Excellent
    Trustworthy
    Excellent
    Responsive
    Excellent
    Knowledgeable
    Excellent
    Kept me informed
    Excellent
    • I recommend David Slepkow.
    • I used David 1-3 years ago.
    • David handled my Divorce / Separation matter.
    • I have previously worked with 1-2 lawyers.

    David was amazing in handling my case. He is thourough, persistant, and passionate. My case involved relocation, divorce, and custody issues. David never gave up and is still fighting to this day. He’s not only my attorney but has become my friend and I would reccomend him to everyone!

    David Slepkow reviews and ratings

No comment yet.
Scooped by David Slepkow
Scoop.it!

Rhode Island: Toughest state in country to invalidate a prenuptial!

Rhode Island: Toughest state in country to invalidate a prenuptial! | RI Divorce Attorney | Scoop.it
Need a Prenuptial agreement in RI? CALL Rhode Island premarital agreement attorney, David Slepkow 401-437-1100. RI divorce lawyer. RI divorce lawyer, David Slepkow was voted a top 3 lawyer in RI by the Providence Journal Readers choice poll.
David Slepkow's insight:
Rhode Island: Toughest state in country to invalidate a prenuptial!
january 19, 2018 by david (edit)

Rhode Island may be the toughest state in the country to invalidate or challenge a prenuptial agreement. The RI Supreme Court has made prenuptial agreements extremely difficult to set aside and invalidate! Perhaps, it is nearly impossible to invalidate a prenuptial in Rhode Island? A divorce lawyer in RI explains the validity of premarital agreement in RI.

In order for a prenuptial agreement to be unenforceable, it must be both involuntary and unconscionable!

 

RI prenuptial agreement attorney

When you read the case of Marsocci v Marsocci, there can only be one rational response and that is: “Wow, really?”  Marsocci and Rhode Island General Law § 15-17-6 stand for the proposition that in order for a prenuptial agreement to be unenforceable it must be both involuntary and unconscionable. (Unconscionable means totally and completely unfair)

Does this mean that a property settlement agreement that was fair but was involuntary could be enforceable under Rhode Island Law? That seems to be a preposterous proposition. However, according to the clear reading of case law and § 15-17-6, it appears to be the law in Rhode Island! Does that mean a person could argue: ‘the agreement was fair even though I was threatening my girlfriend with a weapon if she didn’t sign the agreement.’ I seriously doubt that any Rhode Island Family Court Judge would uphold a premarital agreement entered into under those circumstances. However, that example illuminates the absurd state of Rhode Island Law concerning Prenuptial agreements. The seminal case in Rhode Island concerning prenuptial agreements is Marsocci v. Marsocci, 911 A.2d 690 (RI 2006) Supreme Court of Rhode Island. Debra L. MARSOCCI v. David A. MARSOCCI No. 2005-149-A. Decided: December 15, 2006 Present:  WILLIAMS, C.J., and GOLDBERG, SUTTELL, and ROBINSON, JJ. Alfred Factor, Esq., for Plaintiff. Donald R. Lembo, Esq., North Providence, for Defendant. OPINION

“Enforce-ability of a premarital agreement is governed by the Uniform Premarital Agreement Act as codified in § 15-17-6” In Marsocci, the Court stated “In Rhode Island, the enforce-ability of a premarital agreement is governed by the Uniform Premarital Agreement Act as codified in § 15-17-6. ####

The legislature “clearly evidenced the intent to preserve the validity of such agreements”

In Marsocci, the Rhode Island Supreme Court reasoned “We have noted that when the Legislature enacted the provisions of § 15-17-6, it clearly evidenced the intent to preserve the validity of such agreements [and] * * * [maintain] the integrity of such agreements.” Id. at 696. Citing Penhallow v. Penhallow, 649 A.2d 1016, 1021 (R.I. 1994). Penhallow v. Penhallow 649 A.2d 1016 (1994) John PENHALLOW v. Susan M. PENHALLOW. No. 93-137-Appeal. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. November 21, 1994. *1017 Robert D. Oster, Oster & Groff, Lincoln, for plaintiff. William F. Holt, Kirshenbaum & Kirshenbaum, Cranston, for defendant. OPINION LEDERBERG, Justice.

Significant burden upon the party seeking to render the agreement unenforceable

The Marsocci Court further opined “To that end, the Legislature placed a significant burden upon the party seeking to render the agreement unenforceable – that party must prove all of the elements in §§ 15-17-6(a)(1) and (2), and must do so by clear and convincing evidence….We are satisfied that § 15-17-6(b) unambiguously provides that: ‘[t]he burden of proof as to each of the elements required in order to have a premarital agreement held to be unenforceable shall be on the party seeking to have the agreement declared unenforceable’ * * *.”

The Marsocci’s signed a prenuptial agreement four days prior to the wedding

In Marsocci, the husband David and the wife Debra were married on August 26, 1995. The parties signed a prenuptial agreement four days prior to the wedding. Both parties signed the agreement, and it was witnessed. “The trial justice found that each asset David listed was unaccompanied by a dollar value; nor was there a written waiver of Debra’s right to disclosure of the value of her husband’s property and his financial obligations.” In Marsocci, the trial judge determined, “There is no information contained in this agreement as to the values of any of Mr. Marsocci’s assets.” The trial judge found that Debra ” has nothing and agrees to end up with nothing after her marriage…” The husband, David, was represented by counsel and the wife Debra did not have an attorney representing her.

RI top Court upholds premarital agreement

The Rhode Island Supreme Court upheld the validity of the prenuptial agreement holding that Debra did not prove all elements of the Premarital Agreement Act by clear and convincing evidence.

If a person signs a prenuptial without a lawyer is it enforceable?

Yes.  A prenup in Rhode Island is enforceable even if one or both parties did not have a lawyer. It may be preferable for a person to have a Rhode Island divorce lawyer but it is far from required to make the premarital agreement enforceable.

Rhode Island premarital agreement attorney

David Slepkow is a Rhode Island divorce attorney concentrating in divorce, family law, restraining orders, child support, custody and visitation. David Slepkow has been practicing for over 18 years and is licensed in Rhode Island, Massachusetts and the United States Supreme Court. Free initial consultations. Credit Cards Accepted.

####Section 15-17-6 states:

“(a) A premarital agreement is not enforceable if the party against whom enforcement is sought proves that:

(1) That party did not execute the agreement voluntarily; and

(2) The agreement was unconscionable when it was executed and, before execution of the agreement, that party:

(i) Was not provided a fair and reasonable disclosure of the property or financial obligations of the other party;

(ii) Did not voluntarily and expressly waive, in writing, any right to disclosure of the property or financial obligations of the other party beyond the disclosure provided; and

(iii) Did not have, or reasonably could not have had, an adequate knowledge of the property or financial obligations of the other party.

(b) The burden of proof as to each of the elements required in order to have a premarital agreement held to be unenforceable shall be on the party seeking to have the agreement declared unenforceable and must be proven by clear and convincing evidence.

(c) If a provision of a premarital agreement modifies or eliminates spousal support and that modification or elimination causes one party to the agreement to be eligible for support under a program of public assistance at the time of separation or marital dissolution, a court, notwithstanding the terms of the agreement, may require the other party to provide support to the extent necessary to avoid that eligibility.

(d) An issue of unconscionability of a premarital agreement shall be decided by the court as a matter of law.”

 

filed under: prenuptial agreement
No comment yet.
Scooped by David Slepkow
Scoop.it!

The Intersection of Family Law & Criminal Law in RI | Article 1 of 5

The Intersection of Family Law & Criminal Law in RI | Article 1 of 5 | RI Divorce Attorney | Scoop.it
Call RI divorce, child custody and family law attorney, David Slepkow 401-437-1100 No contact order, RI criminal lawyer, restraining order, divorce. Providence Family Court. Rhode Island attorney with 20 years of experience!
David Slepkow's insight:

Criminal charges and criminal prosecutions in Rhode Island are often inextricably intertwined with child custody, paternity, visitation, property rights, restraining orders, divorce and family law issues, either directly or indirectly. There could be multiple proceedings pending in Rhode Island Courts, simultaneously. For example, there could be the following cases pending at the same time:

Divorce and Criminal law in RI

If the parties are not married, in addition to the criminal proceedings, there could be a miscellaneous petition for custody and visitation. There also may be a DCYF (abuse, neglect or dependency) proceeding going forward.  There also could be a RI child support case, paternity proceeding or even a RI Family Court juvenile proceeding. If you were arrested and charged with a criminal charge in RI then you should contact a Rhode Island criminal defense lawyer.  If you need legal help with a divorce in RI, then contact Rhode Island divorce lawyer, David Slepkow 401-437-1100.

part 2 of 5,  part 3 of 5,  part 4 of 5part 5 of 5

What is a “domestic” criminal offense in Rhode Island?

This article applies to misdemeanor criminal charges in Rhode Island and Providence Plantations. A misdemeanor in RI is a “domestic” offense if it involves designated family members, a spouse, girlfriend or boyfriend. The following offenses can be considered domestic offenses under the laws of the Ocean state:

  • assault
  • failure to relinquish telephone
  • harassing phone calls
  • disorderly conduct
  • larceny
  • other criminal charges

If the police assert that there is domestic angle to an assault, the prosecution will be for a “domestic assault” rather than just an “assault.” If an accused is arrested and charged with a domestic offense, a no contact order will issue in favor of the alleged victim or victims. If there is a no Contact order, it  will be a crime for the criminal accused to have any contact with the alleged victim. The issuance of no contact order may wreak havoc upon the family, especially when the alleged accused and the victim are married or have a child together. If the victim and the criminal defendant are residing together then the local police may throw the accused out of his or her residence / home. This quasi eviction creates an entirely new set of challenges for the affected family unit. In some instances, the accused perpetrator is the sole provider of support for the family and the children.

Visitation and custodial issue | no contact order

If there are minor children involved then visitation and custodial issues may arise, immediately. The father or mother who was accused of the criminal offense may desire visitation and parenting time with his or her child. The alleged victim may or may not want the alleged criminal to visit with the children. The defendant needs his personal belongings such as clothes, jacket, personal papers, bills, toiletries, tools, computer, work clothes etc. In some cases the victim obtains a restraining order from the Providence Family Court or the 6th Division District Court. The victim may also demand child support. Often the criminal defendant has difficulty affording child support after retaining a RI criminal lawyer.

Should I get a  top Rhode Island Criminal defense lawyer or Divorce lawyer to represent me in a criminal law or divorce case in Rhode Island?

Rhode Island attorney is definitely needed for serious matters such as divorce, child custody and criminal causes of actions. The old adage that is often bandied around is that a person who is their own lawyer has a fool for a client. Rhode Island divorce attorneys and RI criminal defense lawyers are intimately familiar with the court process, RI laws, the judges and magistrates as well as the inner workings of our system of justice. If you are facing criminal charges in Rhode Island and Providence plantations you may have a right to a free RI criminal defense attorney from the Public Defender’s office, if you meet income and eligibility guidelines.

Any crime that the authorities charge as a domestic crime is more serious than the same alleged offense charged as non-domestic. If someone is found guilty of a domestic criminal offense  in RI or who takes a nolo contendere plea deal with the prosecution is required to endure batterers intervention classes. This specifically includes sentences of probation, suspended sentence, one year filings and suspended sentences. Refusal to go to batterers classes as ordered or failure to attend court ordered restitution could be considered a violation of probation, or a  a violation of the terms of a one year filing.

In some cases, when there are quantifiable damages to the victim, such as damaged or destroyed property then the defendant may be ordered to compensate the victim by paying restitution. In some cases, the defendant is ordered to engage in substance abuse or mental health treatment. If a defendant is  arrested,  then a no contact order will enter unless the  purported victim drops the nco. Unless the matter is dismissed, the victim drops the nco or the accused is found not guilty after a judge or jury trial, the no contact order will continue until the probation or suspended sentence terminates.

A 2nd conviction for a domestic criminal offense in RI could result to a minimum of ten days at the adult correctional institution! A 3rd criminal arrest in Rhode Island for a domestic criminal may be charged as a felony in Providence Superior Court. NOT all plea agreements constitute a criminal conviction. In Rhode Island and Providence Plantations any sentence with a suspended sentence, guilty finding, plea of guilty, fine or period of incarceration constitutes a criminal conviction. A nolo contendere plea bargain sentence with a period of  probation or  a one year filing with court costs does not constitute a conviction in RI!

A criminal conviction characterized as a domestic offense will look more menacing then a non-domestic on the accused’s criminal record when seeking employment opportunities. A Justice of the 6th division district court will usually be harsher than sentences for non-domestic offense. Furthermore, a one year filing in the Ocean State which is a domestic offense is not eligible to be expunged at the end of the year filing. There is an additional 2 year waiting period to expunge a domestic filing in RI.  One year filings in RI

More RI Family Court articles here

No comment yet.
Scooped by David Slepkow
Scoop.it!

A guide to equitable division of assets in a RI divorce

  In Rhode Island, all property and assets acquired by the husband and wife (with certain limited exceptions, some of which are set forth in more detail below) during the course of the marriage constitute marital property subject to equitable division by the Family Court. Nonetheless, inheritance and gifts do not constitute marital property in …
David Slepkow's insight:
Is the appreciation of a gift or inheritance subject to equitable division by a Providence Family Court Judge?

No. Pursuant to Rhode Island divorce law, appreciation of inheritance or gifts during the course of the marriage is not subject to equitable distribution

Personal Injury settlements in RI

Personal injury settlements or judgments, in Rhode Island, relating to pain and suffering , disability and certain types of disability pensions are not marital property. However, portions of such settlements pertaining to lost wages during the course of the marriage and medical bills expended during the marriage or other similar such damages do in fact constitute marital property subject to equitable division.  For a more in depth explanation of whether injury awards are marital property in RI, please see also http://rhodeislanddivorcelawyerarticles.com/are-personal-injury-awards-marital-property-in-a-ri-divorce/

Is premarital property subject to equitable division of assets in Providence Family Court?

Assets and property owned by husband or wife prior to the marriage is not marital property subject to equitable division by a Rhode Island family court judge or General Magistrate.

However, the appreciation in value of that account, real estate or property, is marital property. “In order for the appreciation of value of premarital property to be equitably divided, the appreciation must result from the efforts of the spouse who do did not own the asset prior to the marriage. This provision requiring that the appreciation result from the efforts of the other spouse is often loosely applied in Rhode Island Family Court, especially in marriages of long duration.”  See also: http://www.hg.org/article.asp?id=18610 

For example, if husband owned  investment multi-family real estate before  the marriage and the real estate appreciated during the marital union then such appreciation may be  divided by a RI Family Court Justice if wife can show her efforts in some way lead to the appreciation in the investment real estate.

Is property divided half to the wife & half to husband in a divorce in Rhode Island?

No, not in every case.

How can fault be relevant in a divorce in Providence Family Court?

Even though Rhode Island and Providence Plantations is considered a no fault state, fault  allegations ( if they can be proved) can play a significant  role in how the Rhode Island Family Court equitably divides the debts and property of the marriage.  The Providence Family Court Judge or General Magistrate must first determine what property constitutes marital property under RI law. Once that is determined, the RI Family Court Justice will analyze  numerous  factors set forth in  R.I.G.L. 15-5-16.1 to establish the division of marital property.

No comment yet.
Scooped by David Slepkow
Scoop.it!

Landlord liability Types of accidents at residential multifamily homes

Owning a rental property In Rhode Island is not always as easy as some people believe. There are a lot of things a  RI multi-family residential landlord must take into consideration to be protected from legal liability. Legal liability is an issue all landlords need to take into account. If someone gets hurt on a rental …
David Slepkow's insight:
Fire accident

Fires are a type of accident that landlords may be held accountable for if certain conditions are met. It must be proven that the fire resulted from the landlord’s negligence.
For example, if the fire was a result of faulty wiring, it is possible for the landlord to be found negligent. However, it must be proven that they landlord knew about the faulty wiring or should have known about it and failed to take action.  Landlords are not always held liable in the event of house fires. If the fire is caused by events beyond the landlord’s control, he or she will not be held accountable.

Structural Collapse

Structural collapse is another issue in which a landlord could be held liable. A structural collapse could involve the whole house, but this problem is more common for staircases. If a tenant were injured in the structural collapse of a staircase, it must be proven that the landlord was at fault.

For example, the landlord will be held liable if it can be proven that he or she was aware of the unsafe condition of the staircase. If the landlord took reasonable measures to fix the issue, he or she would not be held liable.

Citations and Resources

“In a recent New York case 1 the Court of Appeals laid down a doctrine for determining the liability of a landlord for damage resulting from gratuitous repairs.” Liability of a Landlord for Negligently Making Repairs When Not Obligated to Do So St. John’s Law Review Volume 7 Issue 1 Volume 7, December 1932, Number 1  Irving L. Wharton http://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6138&context=lawreview

35 UALR L. Rev. 1049 (2012-2013)  Caveat Who: A Review of the Landlord/Tenant Relationship in the Context of Injuries and Maintenance Obligations http://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/ualr35&div=44&id=&page=

No comment yet.
Scooped by David Slepkow
Scoop.it!

11 Reasons Why People Fall Behind on Child Support

11 Reasons Why People Fall Behind on Child Support | RI Divorce Attorney | Scoop.it
Millions of children rely on child support from their parents. While most people want to provide for their children, there are times that child support doesn’t get paid in a timely fashion. The following are the 11 top reasons people fall behind on child support. 1. They Believe It’s Not Helping Their Children According to Familylawyermagazine.com, …
David Slepkow's insight:
1. They Believe It’s Not Helping Their Children

According to Familylawyermagazine.com, many individuals don’t see how the money being paid is directly helping their children.

2. People Don’t Like Judges and Lawyers Making Their Decisions

Hard working adults may often resent a stranger, and in particular a judge or a lawyer, telling them how and when to take care of their children.


3. Lost Jobs
Losing a job and a steady source of income can definitely cause a person to fall behind on child support.


4. A New Family
If a person gets married or has more children it may become more difficult to keep up with regular payments.


5. Fear That the Money is Misspent
If parents think the money is going to support the custodial parent’s lifestyle and not the child, they may be hesitant to keep up regular payments.


6. Disagreements About Raising the Children
When one parent disagrees with how the other parent is raising the children they may not make regular child support payments until the matter is resolved.


7. Can’t See the Children
Whether it’s court ordered or a parent is keeping the kids from another parent, the non-custodial parent may stop making payments.


8. To Get Back at a Spouse
When couples break up, the relationship can become complicated. Unfortunately, some people may withhold child support to get back at the other parent.


9. Low Paying Job
Even if an individual is working a regular job, it may be considered low-income. The National Conference of State Legislatures describes how a low paying job can cause a person to fall behind on support.


10. Substance Abuse
Drug or alcohol addiction can drain a person’s resources or cause them to become irresponsible and fall behind on payments.

No comment yet.
Scooped by David Slepkow
Scoop.it!

Intersection of Family Law, Divorce & Criminal Law

Intersection of Family Law, Divorce & Criminal Law | RI Divorce Attorney | Scoop.it
Involved in a RI divorce or custody battle involving criminal charges? CALL RI divorce, custody and criminal attorney David Slepkow 401-437-1100.
No comment yet.
Scooped by David Slepkow
Scoop.it!

Post Divorce Tips Article in Providence Family Court

Post Divorce Tips Article in Providence Family Court | RI Divorce Attorney | Scoop.it
Rhode Island divorce lawyer, David Slepkow 401-437-1100. RI divorce attorney. Post divorce motions. Child Custody and Support in RI. Avoid Divorce mistakes.
David Slepkow's insight:

A Rhode Island divorce lawyer drafted these Rhode Island post divorce and child Custody Law TIPS. These tips will help you avoid divorce mistakes. Many of these post divorce tips address issues concerning:

child support modification,
Providence Family Court divorce strategy,
child support contempt,
motions to modify visitation and
child support termination and modification.
Post divorce motions to modify
The legal article gives important advice about payment of spousal support in the Ocean State and modification and termination of alimony. This domestic law post about divorce mistakes also contains helpful information concerning:

modification of the final judgment of divorce based on a substantial change in circumstances related to the minor children
contempt for failure to pay child support,
spousal support (alimony),
Failure to comply with the terms of the final judgment or property settlement agreement.
divorce mistakes to avoid in Providence Family Court:
Do not Post, tweet, pin, or scoop about your Rhode Island divorce, custody or family law case. These posts anger Providence Family Court judges who do not see them as helping to resolve the matter. These posts could be detrimental to the child who may view the post online. Win your divorce or custody case in the Courtroom, not on Facebook.
Do not forget to file a motion to modify child support when you become unemployed or have a decrease in income. Child support in Rhode Island can only be modified retroactively to the date you file your motion and serve the other litigant with notice.
Do not interrupt a RI Family Court Judge in Court.
Do not dress inappropriately for a Providence Family Court hearing. Providence Family Court is not a beach, gym or nightclub. Remember: Perception is reality.
If you are involved in a contested custody or visitation war, make sure you do not use illegal drugs such as marijuana. In a custodial matter, you are always subject to drug testing upon a moments notice.
Never treat clerks, court personnel, sheriffs or court investigators inappropriately. Judges will be very angry about this as they will always try to protect their staff.
Never make important rash divorce related decisions to get things over with when you are angry.
Never directly or indirectly disparage the other parent when the minor children are present or can hear the communication. Never argue or fight with your spouse of the other parent while the children are present. website
Rhode Island divorce attorney David Slepkow authored this extensive list of post-divorce tips for your review. Divorce in RI can be confusing and complex. Please read this divorce law article carefully.

RI post divorce tips
(1) In the event that there is a marital settlement agreement (msa) or property settlement agreement (psa) in your case, changes to the document need to be in writing. The document must be signed under the same formalities as the original property settlement agreement. This means that the parties signature must be notarized. If husband and wife never executed a property settlement agreement in the underlying divorce and the settlement is set forth in the final judgment of divorce, then official changes can only be made by filing a motion. The parties could also enter a consent order, modifying the original final judgment of divorce. If a motion needs to be filed for child related issues, a modification of the final judgment must be based on a substantial change of circumstances.

(2) It is imperative that you keep and maintain accurate records concerning any payment of spousal support (alimony in RI), child support, uninsured medical expenses and extracurricular costs that you have incurred or reimbursed.

Everything important should be in writing, post-divorce
(3) It is a very bad idea to attempt to modify your property settlement agreement with a verbal agreement. ALL changes to the written marital settlement agreement must be in writing, signed by both parties in front of a notary public. Divorce in RI is a serious matter and serious changes to a property settlement agreement should not be verbal.

(4) If you give your child spending money or buy clothes, sporting goods, sneakers or gifts for your child or children, these payments will be considered gifts and will not count as a credit towards your child support obligation. Child support in Rhode Island must be given directly or via wage garnishment to the custodial parent via cash or check.

(5) If the parent with physical custody of your child is receiving cash benefits (welfare) then consider stopping direct payments of child support! You must make the payment to Rhode Island and Providence Plantations as reimbursement of the cash assistance. In the event that the custodial parent of your children is on cash assistance and you present direct payments, then these funds will be tantamount to a gift. The State of Rhode Island (RI) will still pursue you for the child support payments in Providence Family Court, even though you are still tendering the child support to the custodial parent.

Receipts and detailed divorce records are key!
(6) If you are in a high conflict situation with the mother or father of your child then keep detailed records of visitation dates and times, activities and important events and communications pertaining to visitation and custodial rights.

(7) If you must pay your spousal support, child support or alimony in cash then you need to get a signed receipt of all payments. That receipt must clearly indicate what each payment was for.

(8) If there is a restraining order, order protection from abuse or criminal no contact order between you and your ex-girlfriend, girlfriend, wife, ex-wife or ex friend with benefits, do not contact the alleged victim without the restraining order or abuse order being dismissed. You need to verify with the Clerk of the Providence Family Court that the restraining order has in fact been dismissed. You need to see a copy of the actual dismissal.

(9) Even if the purported victim invites you over or contacts you on Facebook, instant message or cell phone, you could still be arrested for violating the abuse restraining order. Any type of communication including skype, letters, instant message and /or tweet can be a violation of the restraining order

Crucial Info: divorce in RI
If your circumstances change dramatically and alimony is modifiable, look into filing a motion to modify alimony, immediately. This is applicable only if the spousal support is modifiable. In the event the marital settlement agreement is incorporated into the final judgment and spousal support is non modifiable then such spousal support / alimony is non modifiable. If there is no property settlement agreement in your RI divorce cause of action and the court made an award of alimony, then the spousal maintenance is probably modifiable upon a substantial change in circumstances. A substantial change of circumstances could be a substantial loss of income, loss of employment or a severe disability etc

Child Support in Rhode Island post-divorce
Child support in Rhode Island does not terminate automatically upon a child attaining the age of eighteen. Child support will automatically accrue unless a Motion to Terminate Child Support is filed. If you are the parent with physical placement of your child/children and your income significantly decreases or your ex-spouse’s income significantly increases, then you should contact a lawyer to file a Motion to increase your child support payments. If you are parent without physical custody of your children and your income decreases significantly or your ex-spouse’s income significantly increases, then you should contact a Rhode island child support attorney to file a Motion to lower your child support order. If you cannot pay your RI child support because of a change in circumstances you need to file a motion to modify child support immediately otherwise you can be subjected to a contempt proceeding for failure to pay child support.

Statistics and Useful Info:
The estimated number of divorces granted in December 1997 was 104,000 compared with 94,000 divorces granted in December a year earlier. The divorce rate per 1,000 population for December increased from 4.2 in 1996 to 4.5 in 1997. The cumulative number of divorces granted in 1997 was 1,163,000, 1 percent more than the number for 1996 (1,150,000). The divorce rate per 1,000 population for 1997 was the same as the rate for 1996 (4.3), the lowest divorce rate in over two decades (3). The divorce rate per 1,000 married women 15 years of age and over was 19.8 in 1997, 2 percent higher than the rate for 1996, (19.5) which was the lowest rate since 1974.” Births, Marriages, Divorces, and Deaths for 1997 Provisional Data From the CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION/National Center for Health Statistic

“Marriage and divorce are both common experiences. In Western cultures, more than 90 percent of people marry by age 50. Healthy marriages are good for couples’ mental and physical health. They are also good for children; growing up in a happy home protects children from mental, physical, educational and social problems. However, about 40 to 50 percent of married couples in the United States divorce. The divorce rate for subsequent marriages is even higher.” American Psychological Association, Marriage and Divorce

www.slepkowlaw.com/divorce.htm

No comment yet.
Scooped by David Slepkow
Scoop.it!

Haphazard life insurance trusts common in divorce | How to do properly

Haphazard life insurance trusts common in divorce | How to do properly | RI Divorce Attorney | Scoop.it
RI Divorce attorney: Life insurance should be a critical part of divorce settlement negotiations. Unfortunately. it is treated haphazardly in a RI divorce
No comment yet.
Scooped by David Slepkow
Scoop.it!

Surviving Divorce in RI: The do’s and don’ts post divorce

Surviving Divorce in RI: The do’s and don’ts post divorce | RI Divorce Attorney | Scoop.it
Need a divorce in Rhode Island? CALL RI divorce lawyer, David Slepkow 401-437-1100. RI post divorce attorney, child custody and child support.
David Slepkow's insight:

Surviving a divorce in Rhode Island can be a vulnerable and painful time that seems to never end. In addition to the emotional fallout, many ex-spouses face numerous post-divorce issues involving child support, spousal maintenance, custody issues, motions, alimony terminations, order modifications and enforcement that seem to pull them back into court. Post divorce issues can be as complicated and perplexing as divorce in itself. Providence Family Court is a complex place. If you are in need of a divorce attorney in Providence contact one of the top Providence RI divorce lawyers.

Rhode Island divorce attorney

Rhode Island divorce attorney

Many times, spouses believe that the divorce decree finalizes many of the problems the family faced only to realize it is the start of lifelong changes that take a substantial amount of time to resolve. In some incidences, the bitter, resentful feelings lead to unexpected consequences when facing substantial changes in circumstances or when an action is not being complied with in accordance to the judge’s orders.

Do’s and Don’ts after divorce

As a part of recovering from the divorce process, the following do’s and don’ts should be followed to minimize many of the legal issues post-divorce. They include:

  • Don’t Publicly Display Your Bitter Emotions after divorce– Providence family court judges never look favorably on an ex-spouse who scoops, posts, pins or tweet any information concerning your family law issues, custody challenges or Rhode Island divorce. In fact, public displays of private family information might be detrimental to the children who view them online. Make the effort to avoid social media and instead win your legal battles in front of your judge in Family Court.
  • Do File Modification Petitions Quickly after divorce – It is essential to file your motion in Family Court to modify child support payments if your employment status has changed and you have a substantial decrease in your income. This is because in Rhode Island, child support can only be modified retroactively from the date your motion was filed and the other litigant was served a notice of the claim.
  • Do Follow Acceptable Court Decorum – Show up to court dressed properly and never interrupt the Family Court judge. It is essential to remember that perception is reality everywhere, including in Providence Family Court, which should never be confused with a nightclub, gym or beach.
  • Don’t Be Disrespectful – Any display of disrespect to court investigators, sheriffs, court personnel or court clerks will not sit well with your Family Court judge in charge of making decisions about your future and the future of your children. Be respectful at all times and recognize that judges will always protect their staff.
  • Don’t Take Illegal Drugs – If you are in the middle of a contested visitation or custody battle, it is essential to avoid all illegal drugs including marijuana and cocaine. This is because as a custodial matter, you are likely subject to take drug tests at any given moment.
  • Do Take the Time to Make the Right Decisions post-divorce– Making a rash decision involving your family or divorce disputes when angry will never serve in your best interest. Take all the time you need to make the right decision for all involved.
  • Don’t Belittle Others in Front of Minor Children – Directly or indirectly belittling your minor children’s other parent when young children can hear the communication must be avoided at all times. This means never fighting or arguing with the other parent anytime the child is present or in the vicinity.

Following these do’s and don’ts after divorce can help you obtain the best answers in resolving your post-divorce issues. While settling disputes do not always happen right away, many of the legal problems you are dealing with after your divorce will be settled in time.

“The biggest mistake divorcing spouses can make is being in the dark about finances. If your spouse has always handled all of the financial decisions in your household and you don’t have any information about you and your spouse’s income and assets, your spouse will have an unfair advantage over you when it comes time to settle the financial issues in your divorce. If you suspect your spouse is planning a divorce, get as much information as you can now. Make copies of important financial records such as account statements (eg., savings, brokerage, and retirement) and all other data that relates to your marital lifestyle (eg.,checking accounts, charge card statements, tax returns).” http://www.divorcenet.com/states/new_york/15_critical_mistakes_in_divorce#b  Divorce net published by Nolo, 15 Critical Mistakes in Divorce

Rhode Island divorce lawyer, David Slepkow represents clients in Rhode Island Family Court in the following types of family law matters: child custody, visitation, child support, divorce, alimony and paternity. David was voted a top three lawyer in Rhode Island by The Providence Journal Reader’s poll.

No comment yet.
Rescooped by David Slepkow from California Car Accident and Injury Attorney News
Scoop.it!

Rider files suit against Uber over allegations of assault and battery | Northern California Record

Rider files suit against Uber over allegations of assault and battery | Northern California Record | RI Divorce Attorney | Scoop.it
SAN FRANCISCO – A rider has filed a suit against Uber over allegations she was assaulted by a driver.

Via Steven M. Sweat
No comment yet.
Scooped by David Slepkow
Scoop.it!

Absurd RI family laws- these are still Law!

Absurd RI family laws- these are still Law! | RI Divorce Attorney | Scoop.it
Rhode Island family attorney, David Slepkow 401-437-1100 sets forth a number of wacky and absurd Rhode Island laws. Rhode Island family law attorney.
David Slepkow's insight:
Absurd RI family laws- these are still Law!
september 25, 2010 by david (edit)

Rhode Island has some strange, anachronistic and outdated laws. Below you will find a small selection of odd and outmoded RI laws pertaining to family law and marriage. These RI laws should have been repealed ages ago.

Rhode Island Family laws- outdated, strange and unbelievable!

This post was authored by Rhode Island divorce attorney, David Slepkow.

Outdated and strange Rhode Island laws

  • 15-4-11 Agent for husband – Husband as agent

“The wife may act as agent or attorney of her husband, and the husband may act as the agent or attorney of his wife.” Editor’s note: Believe it or not, this is still the law in Rhode Island!   It is ridiculous. However, it has never been repealed by the Legislature.  I could only imagine a husband representing his wife in a divorce. Is this an exception to the unauthorized practice of law Statute?  Seriously, Perhaps the Rhode Island Legislature should get to work on repealing this. Warning: Cite this Statute in Court at your own risk!

  • 15-4-1 Ownership of separate property

“The real estate, chattels real, and personal estate which are the property of any woman before marriage, or which may become the property of any woman after marriage, or which may be acquired by her own industry, including damages recovered in suits or proceedings for her benefit and compensation for her property taken for public use, and the proceeds of all such property, shall be and remain her sole and separate property free from control of her husband.” Editor’s Note: A Literal Interpretation of this statute seems to be in direct contravention to the Equitable Distribution Statute!

  • 15-3-9 Statement of objections to marriage

“If any person has any lawful objection to the marriage of any two (2) persons, he or she may state the objection in writing, under his or her hand, to the minister, elder, justice, or warden about to solemnize the marriage, at which time the minister, elder, justice, or warden shall proceed no further in the marriage until the lawful objection has been removed.” Editor’s note: RI General Law 15-3-9 This outdated, ridiculous and absurd Rhode Island  marriage law has not been repealed yet! How could this play out? If someone submits an objection a wedding must be stopped until the lawful objection has been removed? What is a Lawful Objection? How does the objection become removed? Can someone ruin a wedding based on this wacky Rhode Island law.  Who determines whether the objection should be removed? Who determines whether the objection will be removed? This could lead to the theater of the Absurd. Nonetheless, this is the LAW in Rhode Island

Legal Notice per RI Rules of Professional Responsibility:

The Rhode Island Supreme Court licenses all lawyers and attorneys in the general practice of law, but does not license or certify any lawyer/ attorney as an expert or specialist in any field of practice.

No comment yet.
Scooped by David Slepkow
Scoop.it!

Worst 3 divorces in RI | Trainwreck, bitter, contentious & costly in RI Family Court

Worst 3 divorces in RI | Trainwreck, bitter, contentious & costly in RI Family Court | RI Divorce Attorney | Scoop.it
Nasty & contentious divorce? CALL RI divorce attorney David Slepkow 401-437-1100. Providence Family lawyers. Rhode Island Supreme Court
David Slepkow's insight:

Your primary goal in Providence Family Court should be to avoid your divorce turning into a train wreck similar to the cases set forth in this article.  The RI divorce cases described below were so out of control, costly and contentious that they can only be described as a “train wreck.” Thankfully, I was not involved in any way with any of these cases! If you are in need of a RI divorce attorney contact a Rhode Island divorce lawyer.

RI divorce war

Divorce in RI and Custody Nuclear Wars- the top 3

Before you go to war in Rhode Island Family Court- Consider these Cases!  After reading these cases, a divorce settlement does not seem that bad? After learning of the RI divorce wars,  divorce mediation does not sound too bad? Below you will find actual quotes from the Rhode Island Supreme Court from the following Cases:

  1. Cardinale v. Cardinale
  2. Fossa v Fossa
  3. Bergquist v. Cesario

 

Divorce in RI mess #1 – Cardinale v. Cardinale 

This unfortunate and ridiculous RI divorce trial is notable and infamous for four primary reasons:

  • The animosity, lack of civility and rancor between the divorce attorneys involved in the cause of action.
  •  6 separate appeals to the Rhode Island Supreme Court during the course of the case. 
  • 35 court orders by the RI Supre Court during the lower court divorce proceeding!
  • The Rhode Island Supreme Court  actually decided the  divorce trial rather than the trial justice.
  • The highest court in RI discharged the trial justice from handling the case. This may be unprecedented.

Bitterly contested, procedurally defective, bifurcated divorce proceeding

“The plaintiff, Joanne T. (DiCarlo) Cardinale (Joanne), and the defendant, Norman A. Cardinale (Norman), are no strangers to the Rhode Island Supreme Court.   During the last four years, the Cardinales repeatedly have come before us seeking emergency relief and filing petitions for writs of certiorari in connection with their bitterly contested, procedurally defective, bifurcated divorce proceeding.   During that time, this Court has issued no fewer than thirty-five separate orders and granted six writs of certiorari.   Indeed, if we administered a frequent flyer program, the Cardinales undoubtedly would be platinum members.” Supreme Court of Rhode Island. Joanne T. CARDINALE v. Norman A. CARDINALE. No. 2004-58-Appeal. Decided: January 9, 2006 Present:  WILLIAMS, C.J., GOLDBERG, FLAHERTY, and ROBINSON, JJ. Maureen Gemma, Esq., Cranston, for Plaintiff. James A. Bigos, Esq., for Defendant. OPINION http://caselaw.findlaw.com/ri-supreme-court/1090682.html “Thus, on January 2, 2003, the divorce proceeding was bifurcated, and the parties embarked upon this long, painful, bitter dispute over the remnants of the marital estate.” Id.

Trial justice refuses to decide case forthwith

“Once the case returned to Family Court, the trial justice issued another order declining to recuse from the proceeding.   Unfortunately, the trial justice, speaking as “an officer of the court,” chose to provide commentary about his view of this Court’s lack of appreciation of his caseload and the day-to-day workings of the Family Court.   Specifically, he took issue with our directive to decide this case “forthwith” and declared, “I agree with [Norman’s counsel] that I don’t think the [the Supreme Court], the folks sitting up on the hill, understand fully what goes on here, of the caseloads involved.”  The trial justice did not comply with our directive that the case be decided forthwith.” Id.

Acrimonious proceeding and rancor between those involved is the reason RI top Court decides the case

“The level of rancor between the parties and counsel and the unfortunate posture taken by the trial justice have prompted us to direct the remedy in this case. Although we seldom deem it necessary to resort to our inherent supervisory powers to fashion remedies, we have done so on occasion to end seemingly interminable litigation. This case presents us with such a controversy.” …”As we have observed, the pool of marital assets remaining after four years of litigation has been diminished substantially by this acrimonious proceeding and Norman’s slipshod and evasive business practices.”

Trial Justice failed to keep control of the divorce proceeding

“In her brief to this Court Joanne has alleged that the conduct and comments of the trial justice suggest bias that would lead a reasonable person to question his impartiality. This was not a simple case, and its difficulty was greatly compounded by the fact that counsel were antagonistic and caustic toward each other and the parties. Although we do not undertake this discussion lightly, the level of acrimony contained in this record requires our review. The lack of civility between counsel in this case is regrettable and inappropriate.  It was the responsibility of the trial justice to control the proceedings and counsel.   He failed to do so.” Id. Moreover, the trial justice’s comments about the numerous orders issued by this Court were inappropriate, if not petulant.The plaintiff has alleged that “[h]er decision to seek instructions from this Court had an immediate impact on the trial judge’s attitude, much like throwing gas on a fire.”Id.

Trial Justice benched because of improper commentary

This commentary by a judicial officer is improper and suggests a preconceived or settled opinion against a litigant, such that the trial justice should be excused from further responsibilities in this case. Cavanagh v. Cavanagh, 118 R.I. 608, 621, 375 A.2d 911, 917 (1977) (citing State v. Buckley, 104 R.I. 317, 322, 244 A.2d 254, 257 (1968)).”Id. “While we are of the opinion that the trial justice did not conduct himself with the demeanor that we expect from a judicial officer, our correction of his rulings pursuant to our inherent power to craft a remedy, means that the parties were not ultimately deprived of their due process.”Id.

Divorce war #2 : Fossa v Fossa | RI divorce at Rhode Island Supreme Court

  • unnecessary and unseemly contentiousness
  • disconcerting case
  • divorce battle – divorce war
  • Divorce in RI

“Apparent unnecessary and unseemly contentiousness and perhaps “gamesmanship”

“This case has been pending in the Family Court since October of 2000, and numerous lawyers and judicial officers have been involved with it at one time or another.   The degree of apparent unnecessary and unseemly contentiousness (and perhaps “gamesmanship” as well) reflected by the record is disconcerting. Quite frankly, the travel of this case reminds us of the mythical case of Jarndyce v. Jarndyce, which Dickens so devastatingly satirized over 150 years ago in Bleak House.   He describes that case in pertinent part as follows:“ [Jarndyce v. Jarndyce ] drones on.   This scarecrow of a suit has, in course of time, become so complicated, that no man alive knows what it means.   The parties to it understand it least; but it has been observed that no two Chancery lawyers can talk about it for five minutes, without coming to a total disagreement as to all the premises.”   Charles Dickens, Bleak House 7-8 (George Ford & Sylvère Monod eds., W.W. Norton & Co.1985) (1853). We wish to emphasize, however, that the Rhode Island court system is not the Court of Chancery of the Victorian era, and we are determined to see to it that our cherished system never descends to anything approaching that ignominious level.” Supreme Court No. 2004-89-Appeal. (W00-576) Kerri D. Fossa  v.  Richard D. Fossa : Present: Williams, C.J., Goldberg, Flaherty, Suttell, and Robinson, JJ. O P I N I O N PER CURIAM.  https://www.courts.ri.gov/Courts/SupremeCourt/OpinionsOrders/pdf-files/04-89.pdf 

Plaintiff’s counsel lacks candor to the RI Supreme Court

The defendant’s allegations in his written and oral submissions to this Court relative to perceived misconduct on the part of attorneys or judicial officers should be directed, if he chooses, to the appropriate agencies and not to this Court in the first instance. We feel obliged to add that we were dismayed to note the apparent lack of candor on the part of plaintiff’s counsel at oral argument when certain questions pertaining to defendant’s allegations were posed to him by the Court.” Id.

Worst divorce in RI #3: Bergquist v. Cesario

  • Love triangle
  • Like a soap opera
  • Contentious and acrimonious
  • relentless rancor

“A Puccini  opera, or at least a midafternoon soap opera. It might be described not so much as a love triangle, as a romantic rectangle.”

” The background of this case, as gleaned from the record and from representations made by the parties in various pleadings and memoranda, is worthy of a Puccini  opera, or at least a midafternoon soap opera. It might be described not so much as a love triangle, as a romantic rectangle. Before the controversy began, Cesario was involved in a relationship with Amanda Assante, who was a neighbor of Bergquist and his wife, Carol. Although the precise sequence of events is not clear, at some point Bergquist began a relationship with Ms. Assante; and Mrs.Bergquist, perhaps understandably, filed for divorce. Thereafter, Cesario began dating Mrs.Bergquist. Not surprisingly, the divorce was acrimonious and a source of much conflict and confrontation, particularly in light of the close proximity of the Bergquist and Assante homes. Sadly, the Bergquist minor children did not entirely escape the rancor that relentlessly engulfed the adults.” Supreme Court of Rhode Island. Stephen C. BERGQUIST v. John CESARIO. Nos. 2002–614–M.P., 2003–66–Appeal. Decided: February 9, 2004 Present:  FLANDERS   GOLDBERG, and SUTTELL, JJ. Stephen C. Bergquist, pro se, for plaintiff. John Cesario, pro se, for defendant. OPINION
 http://caselaw.findlaw.com/ri-supreme-court/1163627.html 

Legal Notice per Rules of Professional Responsibility: The Rhode Island Supreme Court licenses all lawyers and attorneys in the general practice of law. The Rhode Island Supreme Court does not license or certify any lawyer / attorney as an expert or specialist in any field of practice.

keywords: horrific divorce, nasty divorce, foul, awful, horrendous, bitternessrancourrancorthorninessacrimony,  bitterresentmentacerbity,

Contact us for a free initial consultation

 

Your Name (required)

Your Email (required)

Subject

Your Message

Quiz: 7 + 8=? 

 
 
No comment yet.
Scooped by David Slepkow
Scoop.it!

RI top Court cites Dicken's Bleak House lambasting RI divorce process!

RI top Court cites Dicken's Bleak House lambasting RI divorce process! | RI Divorce Attorney | Scoop.it
RI Supreme Court describes divorce: "This scarecrow of a suit has, in course of time, become so complicated, that no man alive knows what it means "
David Slepkow's insight:

In an unusual and perhaps unprecedented move, the Rhode Island Supreme Court disparaged the procedural history and the divorce process of the now infamous RI divorce case,  Fossa v. Fossa. The Rhode Island Supreme Court did not hold back in it’s decision. The top court blasted the conduct of the lawyers and others involved in the RI divorce. In it’s decision, the Supreme Court of RI cited the epic Charles Dicken’s novel:  “Bleak House.” This is an unfortunate case, to say the least. The following quote by the Rhode Island Supreme Court from the Fossa decision just about says it all:

Providence divorce attorney

“This scarecrow of a suit has, in course of time, become so complicated, that no man alive knows what it means.” 

“This case has been pending in the Family Court since October of 2000, and numerous lawyers and judicial officers have been involved with it at one time or another.  The degree of apparent unnecessary and unseemly contentiousness (and perhaps “gamesmanship” as well) reflected by the record is disconcerting. Quite frankly, the travel of this case reminds us of the mythical case of Jarndyce v. Jarndyce, which Dickens so devastatingly satirized over 150 years ago in Bleak House. He describes that case in pertinent part as follows:“[Jarndyce v. Jarndyce ] drones on. This scarecrow of a suit has, in course of time, become so complicated, that no man alive knows what it means. The parties to it understand it least;  but it has been observed that no two Chancery lawyers can talk about it for five minutes, without coming to a total disagreement as to all the premises.”   Charles Dickens, Bleak House 7-8 (George Ford & Sylvère Monod eds., W.W. Norton & Co.1985) (1853). We wish to emphasize, however, that the Rhode Island court system is not the Court of Chancery of the Victorian era, and we are determined to see to it that our cherished system never descends to anything approaching that ignominious level.”

TITLE OF CASE: Kerri D. Fossa v. Richard D. Fossa DOCKET NO: 2004-0089-Appeal COURT: Supreme DATE OPINION FILED: February 25, 2005 Appeal from SOURCE OF APPEAL: Family County: Washington JUDGE FROM OTHER COURT: Judge John A. Mutter JUSTICES: Williams, C.J., Goldberg, Flaherty, Suttell and Robinson, JJ. Not Participating – Concurring Dissent – WRITTEN BY: Per Curiam ATTORNEYS: For Plaintiff William F. Holt, Esq. ATTORNEYS: For Defendant Richard Fossa, Pro Se  https://www.courts.ri.gov/Courts/SupremeCourt/OpinionsOrders/pdf-files/04-89.pdf 

Read the Fossa case

Read the Fossa divorce case here 

More train wreck RI Divorce disasters 

Legal Notice per Rules of Professional Responsibility: The Rhode Island Supreme Court licenses all lawyers and attorneys in the general practice of law, but does not license or certify any lawyer / attorney as an expert or specialist in any field of practice

No comment yet.
Scooped by David Slepkow
Scoop.it!

Out of State Property Agreements - Can RI Family Court enforce & interpret?

Out of State Property Agreements - Can RI Family Court enforce & interpret? | RI Divorce Attorney | Scoop.it
Rhode Island Family Court has jurisdiction to enforce or interpret a marital settlement / property settlement agreement from another state, RI Law 8-10-3
David Slepkow's insight:
The Rhode Island Family Court has jurisdiction to enforce or interpret a marital settlement agreement or  property settlement agreement from another state, pursuant to RI Law, SECTION 8-10-3. It appears that any confusion regarding jurisdiction of these matters may have been as a result of the poorly written statute, 8-10-3, which is essentially a ridiculous, endless run-on sentence.

RI law: Courts may enforce and interpret marital settlement agreements from other states

RI divorce attorney, David Slepkow

Rhode Island General Law 8-10-3 specifically grants jurisdiction to the Rhode Island Family Court to enforce or interpret a property settlement agreement from another state. RIGL 8-10-3 in pertinent part states “(a) There is hereby established a family court, consisting of a chief judge and eleven (11) associate justices, to hear and determine……… antenuptial agreements, property settlement agreements and all other contracts between persons, who at the time of execution of the contracts, were husband and wife or planned to enter into that relationship;    (### full text of jurisdiction statute below)

In Schwab v Schwab the Rhode Island Supreme Court stated:

“We have said that “the Family Court is a statutory tribunal whose powers are specifically granted by the Family Court Act. Christensen v. Christensen, 121 R.I. 272, 274, 397 A.2d 900, 901 (1979). Among these powers is the authority to “hear and determine all petitions for * * *enforcement of any order or decree granting alimony * * * of any court of competent jurisdiction of another state; [and] modification of any order or decree granting alimony * * * of any court of competent jurisdiction of another state on the ground that there has been a change of circumstances * * *.” G.L. 1956 §8-10-3(a). (Emphases added.)

In  Scheuerman v. Woronoff , a property settlement agreement case, the RI top Court determined:

“In Scheuerman v. Woronoff, 459 A.2d 957 (R.I. 1983), this Court was confronted with the question of whether the Family Court had jurisdiction to modify or enforce a settlement agreement that was incorporated by reference, but not merged in a final divorce decree of a New Jersey court. We interpreted § 8-10-3(a) and held that“[t]he plain language of the amended statute clearly confers jurisdiction on the Family Court to hear and determine matters pertaining to custody, support, alimony, visitation, property-settlement agreements, and contracts between persons who at the time of execution were husband and wife or planned to enter into such a relationship, even though these orders, agreements, or contracts may have originated or been executed in a foreign jurisdiction.” Scheuerman, 459A.2d at 959.”

“Here, as in Scheuerman, a foreign court of competent jurisdiction entered a final judgment of divorce, and a settlement agreement, which was incorporated by reference in the judgment, was executed by the parties in that jurisdiction. Consistent with our clear statement in Scheuerman, we hold that the Family Court had jurisdiction to decide Walter’s motion to set aside the Connecticut judgment and settlement agreement on the merits, and that the hearing justice committed a fundamental error when he denied that motion as well as the motion to reconsider.” SCHWAB v. SCHWAB.

TITLE 8 Courts and Civil Procedure–Courts CHAPTER 8-10 Family Court SECTION 8-10-3:

8-10-3 Establishment of court – Jurisdiction – Seal – Oaths.  (a) There is hereby established a family court, consisting of a chief judge and eleven (11) associate justices, to hear and determine all petitions for divorce from the bond of marriage and from bed and board; all motions for allowance, alimony, support and custody of children, allowance of counsel and witness fees, and other matters arising out of petitions and motions relative to real and personal property in aid thereof, including, but not limited to, partitions, accountings, receiverships, sequestration of assets, resulting and constructive trust, impressions of trust, and such other equitable matters arising out of the family relationship, wherein jurisdiction is acquired by the court by the filing of petitions for divorce, bed and board and separate maintenance; all motions for allowance for support and educational costs of children attending high school at the time of their eighteenth (18th) birthday and up to ninety (90) days after high school graduation, but in no case beyond their nineteenth (19th) birthday; enforcement of any order or decree granting alimony and/or child support, and/or custody and/or visitation of any court of competent jurisdiction of another state; modification of any order or decree granting alimony and/or custody and/or visitation of any court of competent jurisdiction of another state on the ground that there has been a change of circumstances; modification of any order or decree granting child support of any court of competent jurisdiction of another state provided: (1) the order has been registered in Rhode Island for the purposes of modification pursuant to § 15-23.1-611, or (2) Rhode Island issued the order and has continuing exclusive jurisdiction over the parties; antenuptial agreements, property settlement agreements and all other contracts between persons, who at the time of execution of the contracts, were husband and wife or planned to enter into that relationship; complaints for support of parents and children; those matters relating to delinquent, wayward, dependent, neglected, or children with disabilities who by reason of any disability requires special education or treatment and other related services; to hear and determine all petitions for guardianship of any child who has been placed in the care, custody, and control of the department for children, youth, and families pursuant to the provisions of chapter 1 of title 14 and chapter 11 of title 40; adoption of children under eighteen (18) years of age; change of names of children under the age of eighteen (18) years; paternity of children born out of wedlock and provision for the support and disposition of such children or their mothers; child marriages; those matters referred to the court in accordance with the provisions of § 14-1-28; those matters relating to adults who shall be involved with paternity of children born out of wedlock; responsibility for or contributing to the delinquency, waywardness, or neglect of children under sixteen (16) years of age; desertion, abandonment, or failure to provide subsistence for any children dependent upon such adults for support; neglect to send any child to school as required by law; bastardy proceedings and custody to children in proceedings, whether or not supported by petitions for divorce or separate maintenance or for relief without commencement of divorce proceedings; and appeals of administrative decisions concerning setoff of income tax refunds for past due child support in accordance with §§ 44-30.1-5 and 40-6-21. The holding of real estate as tenants by the entirety shall not in and of itself preclude the family court from partitioning real estate so held for a period of six (6) months after the entry of final decree of divorce.

(b) The family court shall be a court of record and shall have a seal which shall contain such words and devices as the court shall adopt.

(c) The judges and clerk of the family court shall have power to administer oaths and affirmations.

(d) The family court shall have exclusive initial jurisdiction of all appeals from any administrative agency or board affecting or concerning children under the age of eighteen (18) years and appeals of administrative decisions concerning setoff of income tax refunds, lottery set offs, insurance intercept, and lien enforcement provisions for past due child support, in accordance with §§ 44-30.1-5 and 40-6-21, and appeals of administrative agency orders of the department of human services to withhold income under chapter 16 of title 15.

(e) The family court shall have jurisdiction over those civil matters relating to the enforcement of laws regulating child care providers and child placing agencies.

(f) The family court shall have exclusive jurisdiction of matters relating to the revocation or nonrenewal of a license of an obligor due to noncompliance with a court order of support, in accordance with chapter 11.1 of title 15.

[See § 12-1-15 of the General Laws.]

(g) Notwithstanding any general or public law to the contrary, the family court shall have jurisdiction over all protective orders provided pursuant to the Rhode Island general laws, when either party is a juvenile.

History of Section.
(P.L. 1961, ch. 73, § 1; P.L. 1972, ch. 30, § 1; P.L. 1973, ch. 125, § 1; P.L. 1974, ch. 85, § 1; P.L. 1975, ch. 3, § 1; P.L. 1976, ch. 252, § 1; P.L. 1977, ch. 89, § 1; P.L. 1980, ch. 54, § 1; P.L. 1981, ch. 319, § 1; P.L. 1984, ch. 167, § 3; P.L. 1984, ch. 281, § 1; P.L. 1987, ch. 163, § 2; P.L. 1988, ch. 84, § 7; P.L. 1992, ch. 326, § 1; P.L. 1994, ch. 158, § 2, P.L. 1994, ch. 195, § 3; P.L. 1994, ch. 244, § 1; P.L. 1994, ch. 263, § 3; P.L. 1995, ch. 370, art. 29, § 10; P.L. 1995, ch. 374, § 10; P.L. 1996, ch. 129, § 1; P.L. 1996, ch. 131, § 1; P.L. 1996, ch. 132, § 1; P.L. 1996, ch. 133, § 1; P.L. 1997, ch. 170, § 23; P.L. 1999, ch. 83, § 6; P.L. 1999, ch. 130, § 6; P.L. 2007, ch. 73, art. 3, § 9; P.L. 2010, ch. 216, § 1; P.L. 2010, ch. 236, § 1.)

Rhode Island divorce attorney, David Slepkow authored this post concerning post divorce litigation in Providence Family Court

 

No comment yet.
Scooped by David Slepkow
Scoop.it!

Where Do I Obtain a Restraining Order in RI- Slepkowlaw

Where Do I Obtain a Restraining Order in RI- Slepkowlaw | RI Divorce Attorney | Scoop.it
Rhode Island Restraining Order lawyer explains where victims of domestic abuse and domestic violence should go to obtain a RI restraining order. This article explains the jurisdiction of RI Family Court, District Court and Superior Court.
David Slepkow's insight:

A Rhode Island restraining order attorney explains the proper Court to file a restraining order in RI. Generally restraining orders between family members, ex family members or people with a child together should be filed in Rhode Island Family Court. Restraining orders between girlfriends and boyfriends without a child together or roommates should be filed in District Court. Unrelated persons and people in landlord / tenant relationships need to file restraining orders in RI Superior Court. More information

RI Family Court Restraining orders

There are three types of restraining orders that can be filed in Rhode Island Family Court:

  1. Complaint Protection from abuse
  2. COMPLAINT FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER WHEN EITHER PARTY IS A JUVENILE
  3. Civil restraining order

Complaint protection from abuse restraining orders:

If the restraining order is against your husband or wife or ex-husband or ex-wife or against a family member by blood or marriage then it should be filed in Rhode Island Family Court. If there is a pending Rhode Island divorce, then the restraining order against a spouse should be filed in Family Court. If an RO is needed against a person who you have a child with, then the restraining order should be filed in Family Court. A restraining filed by a juvenile or against a Juvenile must be filed in Rhode Island Family Court. A restraining order brought by a parent on behalf of the minor child against another parent must be pursued in the Family Court. Before obtaining a restraining order, a person should Consult a Rhode Island lawyer. Please note that this article does not address the grounds necessary to obtain a RO. Please contact Rhode Island Divorce Lawyer, David Slepkow.

Exactly who can file a complaint protection from abuse restraining order in RI Family Court

  • “present or former family members”
  • parents (“Parents” mean persons who together are the legal parents of one or more children, regardless of their marital status or whether they have lived together at any time.)
  • stepparents
  • persons who are or have been in a substantive dating or engagement relationship within the past one year in which at least one of the persons is a minor
  • Parents or guardian’s can file on behalf of a child and themselves

Who constitutes a “present or former family member?”

A present or former family member means the following people can file an abuse restraining order in RI Family Court:

In a Complaint Protection from Abuse, the Family Court may award temporary child support, visitation, and temporary custody of the children. The Court can also award visitation and in some instances may order supervised visitation. The Court can order that the Defendant vacate forthwith and remain out of the household. The Court can also order that a person take batterers classes or drug and alcohol counseling. The Court can order drug and alcohol testing. The Court can also order the Defendant to Surrender possession of all firearms / guns to the Police department. The court  can order that the Defendant  “surrender physical possession of all firearms in the Defendant’s possession, care, custody, or control and further order the Defendant be restrained from purchasing, receiving, or attempting to purchase or receive any firearms while the protective order is in effect.”

Complaint for a protective order when either party is a Juvenile

When either party is a juvenile, the following abuse complaint may be filed: “COMPLAINT FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER WHEN EITHER PARTY IS A JUVENILE.” It is important to note that violation of this type of restraining order is not a crime in itself and is punishable by contempt. However, if a person is found in contempt of this order they could possible be imprisoned. This is distinguishable from a complaint protection from abuse set forth above in which a violation is a crime in itself. This type of  Juvenile protective order if filed on behalf of a minor, would be filed by a parent or guardian on behalf of one or more minor children. There is no requirement for a family relationship or a dating relationship for this type of restraining order. This restraining order is analogous to a Superior Court restraining order.

Civil Restraining Order different from abuse restraining orders in Family Court

There are two types of Family Court restraining orders, “Complaint Protection from Abuse” and a civil restraining order. In a Complaint Protection from Abuse, the Court has jurisdiction to issue a RO for up to 3 years. (If the parent seeks a restraining order on behalf of a child against the other parent, then the restraining order can only be for one year.) Violation of a Rhode Island Complaint protection from abuse restraining order is a crime. A violation of a civil restraining order is not a crime but is punishable by contempt. Please note that civil restraining orders are not nearly as effective as a complaint protection from abuse restraining order and when sought are typically part of a divorce.

District Court restraining order Jurisdiction:

If the RO is against a current boyfriend or girlfriend or an ex boyfriend or girlfriend who you had a substantive dating relationship within the prior year but you have no child with, then Rhode Island District Court is the proper Forum. If you have a child with your current or ex boyfriend/ girlfriend then the restraining order should be filed in the Family Court. (see above) A RO against a current roommate can be filed in District Court. Violation of a District Court Restraining order is a crime.

The following people can file a District Court Abuse Restraining order

  • Emancipated minor
  • Person eighteen (18) years of age or older
  • Not related by blood or marriage to the Defendant

In order to file a a RI District Court Restraining order, you must have the following relationship with the defendant:

“Defendant and I together are not the legal parents of one (1) or more children.
 Defendant and I have resided together within the preceding three (3) years.
 Defendant and I are presently residing in the same living quarters.
 Defendant and I have had a substantive dating relationship within the preceding year.
 My relationship was created by the Defendant’s conduct thereby granting jurisdiction to the District Court under applicable statutes.” District Court complaint

RI Superior Court Restraining order:

If you are seeking a Restraining order against a prior friend, neighbor, landlord or anyone else then the restraining order must be filed in Superior Court. Violation of a Superior Court restraining order does not constitute a crime. Violation of a Superior Court Restraining order is punishable by contempt which could potentially lead to a period of incarceration.

What is the difference between a Restraining order and a no contact order?

A no Contact order is an order issued as a result of a criminal charge. A no Contact order issues at an arraignment either at the police station or at Court. Violation of a no contact order is a crime in itself and may constitute a violation of Probation or a filing. A no contact order expires when the case is over (dismissal or not guilty finding) and at the end of any probation, filing or suspended sentence. A Restraining order stays in effect until the date designated on the restraining order.

If there is a no contact order protecting me in Rhode Island should I also obtain a RO?

A no contact order expires when a case is dismissed. It is also terminated when a person is found not guilty or after any sentence is completed (probation / filing / suspended sentence / deferred sentence) The No Contact order will expire when probation or a filing or suspended sentence is over. If you feel you need protection in case the no contact order expires and are in fear of the person then you may consider seeking a restraining order in family Court, Superior Court or District Court in addition to the no contact order. If there are issues concerning child support and visitation then you may want to seek a restraining order in addition to a no contact order.

Many people are searching for information about the following issues:

  • what are the consequences of a restraining order in ri
  • restraining order violation ri
  • harassment laws in ri
  • non domestic no contact order
  • restraining order warwick ri
  • family court restraining order

The American Bar states,”Approximately 1.3 million women and 835,000 men are physically assaulted by an intimate partner annually in the United States. Patricia Tjaden & Nancy Thoennes, U.S. Dep’t of Just., NCJ 183781, Full Report of the Prevalence, Incidence, and Consequences of Intimate Partner Violence Against Women: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey, at iv(2000), available athttp://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij/pubs-sum/183781.htm http://www.americanbar.org/groups/domestic_violence/resources/statistics.html

The American Bar states, Intimate partner violence made up 20% of all nonfatal violent crime experienced by women in 2001. Callie Marie Rennison, U.S. Dep’t of Just., NCJ 197838, Bureau of Justice Statistics Crime Data Brief: Intimate Partner Violence, 1993-2001, at 1 (2003), available at http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/ipv01.pdf http://www.americanbar.org/groups/domestic_violence/resources/statistics.html

No comment yet.
Scooped by David Slepkow
Scoop.it!

Tips To Win Child Custody in Rhode Island- Slepkow law

CALL Rhode Island Child Custody lawyer, David Slepkow 401-437-1100. Visitation, Legal Custody and Child Support.
David Slepkow's insight:
Legal Custody In RI

If you seek sole custody, the control of your child’s day-to-day needs will be decided by the parent in charge that is given sole custody by the judge.  Joint custody  also involves legal custody. However, joint legal custody refers to the parents sharing decision-making and responsibilities equally. Parties share joint custody in the vast majority of cases in Rhode Island Family Court.

Below are tips to increase the potential of winning child custody in Rhode Island that include:

Be Clear and Concise

Many couples in their battle to divorce in Newport family Court will fight for custody of the child even when it does not fit the parent’s lifestyle. By clarifying what you need in the relationship with your child, it is important to understand the available arrangements for physical custody and visitation.


The less common choice of shared physical custody involves the child spending extended time with one of his or her parents and then extended time with the other. Typically, family court judges stay away from shared custody options because it may be disruptive to the child’s life. Nonetheless, judges will allow the parties to decide themselves that shared placement is best for their family


Many times, the judge will hear testimony from expert witnesses or listen to the child’s own words to determine what is best for them. However, professional advisors can provide legal assistance in preparing for hearings and interviews in how to counteract any recommendation provided to the court by an expert that might undermine your ability to obtain custody of your child.

Respect the Ex-Spouse

It is important to show respect to the ex-spouse even if their ability as a marital partner was less than admirable. This is because the failure to show respect for the spouse’s parenting contributions to the child as an active and nurturing caretaker often places a large roadblock in the courtroom when the judge is attempting to resolve custody issues.

No comment yet.
Scooped by David Slepkow
Scoop.it!

Common Types of Child Visitation Disputes Between Parents

Rhode Island child visitation lawyer
David Slepkow's insight:

Court Involvement


It is important to ensure that children grow up in stable environments. The role of the judge is to make decisions that will afford both parents ample opportunities to interact with their children. Even if you are a non-custodial parent, the judge wants to grant you visitation rights with your child. In many instances, the requests of non-custodial parents will be granted. However, any visitation time should not interfere with the child’s reasonable schedule.


At times, a judge will not initially make a determination. The parents may be sent to a mediator to help them resolve the issue. If the issue cannot be resolved through mediation, the case can be sent to the judge to make a determination. Once the determination has been made, it is expected that both parties adhere to the visitation schedule. In some cases, parents may willfully disregard the visitation schedule.


Seek Legal Guidance


If your visitation rights have been denied by the other parent, there is help available. A RI family law attorney may be able to help you get the visitation order enforced.


In  Rhode Island child custody cases, time is of the essence.

No comment yet.